they only know sound bites, they can't actually debate rationallySure enough, she just waffles on "blah blah crop failure by 2030" etc.
they only know sound bites, they can't actually debate rationallySure enough, she just waffles on "blah blah crop failure by 2030" etc.
Just means they'll be back to their nonsense annoying the public that much sooner.
The environmentalists have decided, in their wisdom, to attack an electric robot built by and electric car company... Not clear what this has to do with stopping oil, it seems quite self-defeating but of course, we know their main aim here is just being lefty activists:
I bet that's 100% about Trump and Musk and the rolling back of climate targets. If it is why don't they bugger off to the states and protest and see what sort of reception they get over there?
I bet that's 100% about Trump and Musk and the rolling back of climate targets. If it is why don't they bugger off to the states and protest and see what sort of reception they get over there?
has there ever been any of these activists caught on video that don;t sound posh.The environmentalists have decided, in their wisdom, to attack an electric robot built by and electric car company... Not clear what this has to do with stopping oil, it seems quite self-defeating but of course, we know their main aim here is just being lefty activists:
The environmentalists have decided, in their wisdom, to attack an electric robot built by and electric car company... Not clear what this has to do with stopping oil, it seems quite self-defeating but of course, we know their main aim here is just being lefty activists:
TBF logically oil that isn't burned doesn't damage the environment
TBF logically oil that isn't burned doesn't damage the environment
The group purports to stop new oil, it doesn't advocate for any nuance like drill for oil still if we're using it for other products/not burning it.
And indeed, as we all saw in GCSE Chemistry lessons, the refining process would result in those fuels being created anyway - different length hydrocarbon chains etc.
Yes the group clearly isn't well thought out. Unfortunately I didn't get those GCSE chemistry classes, sounds interesting.
One thought I have had for a long time is that if global temperatures continue to rise, won't that make some parts of the world that aren't habitable or great for agriculture far more desirable than they once were?
Ah yeah, some schools offered some "dual award science" thing instead of proper science GCSEs.
Anyway here's what you missed out on
![]()
Separating crude oil - Crude oil, hydrocarbons and alkanes - AQA - GCSE Chemistry (Single Science) Revision - AQA - BBC Bitesize
Learn about crude oil, hydrocarbons and alkanes with Bitesize GCSE Chemistry (AQA).www.bbc.co.uk
That aren't habitable now (or rather are not very habitable) - yes it probably could, perhaps in places like Canada, Russia (Siberia) and Scandinavia.
I don't know if it would make them "great" for agriculture per se but it could certainly increase growing seasons if temps warmer for longer or indeed make growing more stuff feasible where it currently isn't - obvs amount of sunlight doesn't change and soil quality might not be great.
I bet that's 100% about Trump and Musk and the rolling back of climate targets. If it is why don't they bugger off to the states and protest and see what sort of reception they get over there?
I'd bet money it's this, there's a bunch of anti-tesla insanity going on at the moment due to politically motivated lunatics being mad at Musk.
Examples:
![]()
Shots fired at Tesla dealership in Tigard, second shooting there in the past week
For the second time in the past week, shots were fired at a Tesla dealership in Tigard, police reported Thursday morning.ktvz.com
![]()
Tesla vehicles vandalized across US since Elon Musk began White House role
Tesla vehicles, dealerships and charging stations have been hit with vandalisms, fires and protests since Elon Musk began his role at the White House.abcnews.go.com
It's political, and I wouldn't put it past the (often) hyper-privileged JSO virtue signallers from taking on the cause by proxy. People that are perpetually online going insane because they've nothing better to do and have been run into the ground by the constant hellscape that news and social media has become.
I don't think destroying Musk property is 'insanity'. He's personally cancelling medical care and social security, while claiming millions in public welfare, as the public debt increases.
Literally shooting at businesses and potentially killing people is insanity.
Setting fire to vehicles and vandalising peoples personal property is insanity.
Be mad at Musk if you're politically motivated and find a healthy outlet to do so, don't attack people trying to live day to day by risking their lives and damaging their property.
You can claim resistance against a tyrant is insanity, but it isn't it's completely logical.
I think you need to give your head a shake.You can claim resistance against a tyrant is insanity, but it isn't it's completely logical.