Associate
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 2,495
She would be very well received on usa talk radio if she is given the opportunity.
Katie Hopkins Sacked
- Thread starter something daft already!!
- Start date
Permabanned
She guests on Limbaugh [ or is it Hannity ? ] on US radio and on Fox TV.
Might come as a shock to SE England dental flossers , but LBC is actually local radio, not heard much in York or Strathpeffer.
Any merit to ANY otherwise worthwhile comment she has made is completely undermined by her being an absolutely horrible person. I cannot think that anyone so horrible is worth listening to because by default they are obnoxious and unreasonable.
It used to be a local London station but with the advent of digital radio they have rebranded (Leading Britain's Conversation) to try to become more national.
Well, it's definitely not Hannity anymore if it was him. He left Fox 'by mutual consent' last week.
Imagine what you've got to say to get fired by Fox!
Well, it's definitely not Hannity anymore if it was him. He left Fox 'by mutual consent' last week.
Imagine what you've got to say to get fired by Fox!
I think Fox is getting rid of a few people that they can't be assed defending anymore.
Most sensible post in this thread !
Permabanned
Just reading up on this ....... very sad for Katie.
Typical closing up rightful freedom of speech, when she just has the guts to speak what majority of people think.
Bearing in mind you still have James O Brian, constantly spewing his liberal far left and round the corner views. Just think it's very wrong.
I'll be complaining daily about O Brien now need to level up the playing field.
Typical closing up rightful freedom of speech, when she just has the guts to speak what majority of people think.
Bearing in mind you still have James O Brian, constantly spewing his liberal far left and round the corner views. Just think it's very wrong.
I'll be complaining daily about O Brien now need to level up the playing field.
For someone who has built a career on being controversial the way she has, I think it's incredibly naive to think her comment of 'we need a final solution' was a mere poor selection of words rather than an intent to attract more controversy.
She knew what she was doing.
That's before you even start to consider what could be meant by 'a final solution', even if you pretend to yourself that she is completely unaware of the phrases historical links to genocide.
Permabanned
With kids and families getting blown up in massacre. Saying we need a final solution seems like the conversation we need to be having. Nothing can be worse than the crime itself. But liberals see it differently.
Nothing can be worse?
If we were to assume she were actually advocating a 'final solution' of ethnic cleansing as the 'final solution to the question of the Jews' was, do you sincerely believe that the mass genocide of all Muslims within the UK wouldn't be worse than a handful of extremists bombing a relatively small number of civilians?
(To be clear I don't think she was advocating that for a second, she just wanted attention)
Caporegime
You have no idea what the phrase refers to do you?
Go Google it and think about that.
You are probably quiet young, with not a great education so it's expected.
Permabanned
Exactly, that means it was made with no intent or hidden agenda. I think like Hopkins comments.
Permabanned
Well if she did then she's was very stupid to do so.
She's not stupid, she's committed to being this contrarian figure as it's what provides her income. She's just getting increasing competition from other commentators who have realised that it's not really that difficult to spout ill-informed crap to a willing audience, so has upped the ante to maintain her USP of being the absolute worst. This time it crossed a line with one of her employers.
Of course she knew, you'd have to be incredibly naive to think she had no idea what 'Final Solution' means historically.
Do you know? You're here saying we need to be talking about 'a final solution'? Is that what you support? Genocide of Muslims?
You avoided the question the first time which makes me think you believe genocide of muslims actually would not be worse.
You are using the term liberals as if it's supporters of an opposing football team / a collective of pantomime villains.
More and more I see left / right / liberal used in this way.
Permabanned
Yes but as you said, she's not stupid. lol at every comment made by politicians referring to nazi. It hasn't ended well. So to me to do it purposely it's silly.