Well you must be , because on many occasions i have said i agree with the prosecutors on various points (and i do generally, for the most part) so you must think that they have not explained why they think he is guilty either.
Kyle Rittenhouse - teen who shot three people in Kenosha
- Thread starter dowie
- Start date
Well you must be , because on many occasions i have said i agree with the prosecutors on various points (and i do generally, for the most part) so you must think that they have not explained why they think he is guilty either.
Well you're starting with a false premise, he didn't try to stop a riot and there were plenty of people like him present who weren't attacked or killed.
Soldato
I'm aware you've said you agree with the prosecutors thanks, keeping it vague again there. You still haven't addressed the direct question, you're deflecting again...
He was there acting as a vigilante?
As he stated on video, although he does lie and claim he is employed as such?
Correct?
Yes your thinking is flawed, people are trained to shot for centre mass for good reason.
Centre mass is where the heart, aorta, pulmonary artery and right lung are lcoated
These clueless tropes come out every time there's a case like this
He should have shot him in the leg right?
You clearly aren't unable to understand the subtlety between using deadly force to defended yourself and intent to kill
I'm not interested in all of your questions, because most of them are tedious and/or nonsensical or based on things I've answered countless times. You just weigh in on conversations with inane and boring replies.
Its hilarious to watch you post "deflection!" at me like a gibbering parrot that has lost its marbles, whilst immediately going into deflection mode about whether you think the prosecutors have explained their case or not
Soldato
Not that I want to be drawn into it; but why was anyone there? The kid clearly likes to play "the good guy", defending the community etc. He's got caught on the wrong end of the wrath of said community. Though travelling rioters are hardly the local community. Trying to say staying at home would de-escalate is a moot point. He was there. As were his victims. Nothing will change that so don't try to - you make the best of the situation you are faced with, not wishful thinking and hindsight.
Come on, don't be credulous here, there are multiple witnesses to the fact the owners asked them to be there and some obvious liability issues (and some security issues) re: why those owners will actively deny that now - despite being pictured with them, allegedly giving them the keys, access to a ladder from inside the business, driving in a car with them to the location etc..
He's stated quite clearly the rifle was for self-defence and he's only used it for that, protecting the business by being present there and putting out fires is a legitemate activity. Most protestors were fine with him wandering around shouting "medic" and "friendly" etc...
Why was he so scared about continuing to run towards them , whilst being chased by Rosenbaum then?
No, they're based on things you've posted and you can't then back up.
Its hilarious to watch you post "deflection!" at me like a gibbering parrot that has lost its marbles, whilst immediately going into deflection mode about whether you think the prosecutors have explained their case or not
You replied with a whole paragraph where you made some silly analogies, even acknowledge one of the analogies was silly and then still didn't just provide an explanation/argument... I think it's because you can't. When it comes down to it, when you've got an assertion you can't really support you just deflect. You'll spend plenty of time replying still but you'll not be able to answer.
Soldato
Because at that point he's then being pursued by one of them surely? I'm not a mind reader - that mob was hostile, he's been getting along fine milling around shouting medic etc.. shouting "friendlies" from a distance but running into a group of rioters while being chased by another rioter has the obvious risk of them being hostile.
(There you go - straight answer to a direct question, not too hard now is it Jono)
Ive supported and backed them up countless times and you tediously saying otherwise like a person possessed isn't going to change that.
Your disagreements have only amounted to a difference of opinion , which isn't that useful. We know where you stand on this.
Permabanned
The US is really at breaking point with its gun toting loonies.
Hm i find that very dubious and a bit of a cope to be honest. That isnt a very straight answer to me. How can they be hostile, whilst also friendly? Does someone turn hostile just because they see someone running?
You are just deflecting again.
Whats your point?