Legal aid should not fund asylum legal action.

Wizzfizz said:
You peeps have far to much time on your hands to be arguing since this morning
Click to expand...

I'm just seeing what the depths of his dishonestly is and just how many times he can call me a racist, something which there is 0 evidence of in my posts and is also entirely against the rules.

Seems some people just don't have the required integrity to act like an adult and admit they lied.
 
VincentHanna said:
Yes, they are applying the law.

You aren't seeking asylum if you've already been registered elsewhere.
Click to expand...

But the article says they have only started this now, despite thousands coming over last year. Are you sure in your assertion that they have been consistently applying law, from the first time someone came over?

Or are you guessing?
 
krooton said:
Interesting, however your maths is off a bit.

67% is factoring in the 24% unknown, so you cannot apply that to the 24%.
Click to expand...

Right you are. The rape figures still show white people appearing to be underrepresented though and the percentages here are of those of known ethnicity and so should not be affected by the error in my previous figures.
 
Mason- said:
If there were a war in France and people fled France to come to the UK. I’d be compassionate, similarly with ROI, Denmark and any other country in which we were the nearest safe haven. It’s hard to feel compassion towards people who are supposedly leaving their nation of birth behind to find asylum due to war or other violent reasons. Only for them to shun Italy or Greece, get smuggled through lorries, drive through Germany, again not applying for asylum, camping in Calais for 3 weeks. Again not applying for asylum in France, and then again either smuggling through lorries on the channel tunnel or crossing the channel in rubber dinghies. I have very little sympathy or compassion for these people. And I’m not apologetic about that.
Click to expand...
There can be countless reasons why they chose to do this but ultimately it boils down to the fact that they are after the best for themselves. Is it really such an abomination for anyone to want that? Note - this isn’t saying things should go unchecked or be ‘unlimited’. Rather, do remember they are humans with very little that are looking out for number 1.
 
Chris Wilson said:
I am sure someone can recommend a safe space to you ;)
Click to expand...
That’s not particularly fair - I didn’t ask anyone not to post their views, nor did I demand that anyone changes their views. Although, it is certainly a more pleasant existence to be ignorant to unpleasant things, I can hold my hand up and say I’m guilty of that.
 
Best thing is, if we let them run away we don't even need to give them legal aid

Screenshot-20200815-081616-Chrome.jpg
 
Nitefly said:
There can be countless reasons why they chose to do this but ultimately it boils down to the fact that they are after the best for themselves. Is it really such an abomination for anyone to want that? Note - this isn’t saying things should go unchecked or be ‘unlimited’. Rather, do remember they are humans with very little that are looking out for number 1.
Click to expand...
That's fine if they are abiding by the law.

Otherwise a bloke ram-raiding a store in Brighton to nick the cash register is just "after the best for themselves", after all.

We have to insist that laws are for everyone, and claiming to be an asylum seeker doesn't mean you can enter the country illegally. There is a legal route to claim asylum. Even if they claim in France or Sweden, that doesn't rule out eventually being legally able to enter the UK, should they choose.
 
Several years in a work / education camp, keep the desirable, boot out the undesirable. Doesn't have to be a crap hole.. very desirable can skip the work camp assuming it can be verified they have the skills we want .... I don't care if someone technically should not get asylum if they are likely to be a benefit to the country they can stay...
 
FoxEye said:
Ultimately it's better for their safety if they understand an illegal crossing is not only dangerous but will not be rewarded.

Fewer attempts should mean less loss of life, after all.

I'm sure @Devilman will be on board with this sensible approach ;)
Click to expand...

Once the government comes down hard and the experiences of those are past to future Invaders l. It will all stop and no one would be in danger.
Until then people lives at both ends will be compromised.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom