• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**LETS SEE YOUR PILEDRIVER OVERCLOCKS - LET ME START WITH 5GHz+!!**

I am still on win7 SP 1 and AFAIK have not downloaded any software for piledriver. Is this right or is there an automatic hotfix?

You can only turn off cores in pairs on the 1604 bios. 3rd and 4th, 5th and 6th etc. Not 1st and 2nd though.
 
Last edited:
It isn't in the ASUS bios.
Only whole module disable, 2 cores at a time.

Apparently there were some older 'special' bios versions with the ability.
I tried all the older versions that are available on ASUS website and none of them had the feature.
 
I am still on win7 SP 1 and AFAIK have not downloaded any software for piledriver. Is this right or is there an automatic hotfix?

You can only turn off cores in pairs on the 1604 bios. 3rd and 4th, 5th and 6th etc. Not 1st and 2nd though.

Ah right, well i got that screeny for you anyway. I was going to say you should disable Core 2, 4, 6, 8.

But it doesn't look like it will let you, strange that as it did with Bulldozer.

Interestingly my boot failed with core-unlocker enabled, it said "wrong CPU for core-unlocker" i still have my 1090T in it. it worked perfectly on the previous BIOS, i did a BF3 threads - bootleneck test with it.

I wonder if Piledriver would mind awfully if it was on an older BIOS?

121127165243.png
 
I am worried that if i publish the results it will upset a few people.

Rofl, why would people get upset?
I mean there's tons of benchmarks around which clearly show the FX83 to have better heavily multi-threaded performance than the i5 3570k, which when an FX83 is 125 is just much better price/performance.

Unless of course you're using something not so multi-threaded etc?
 
Hehe.. its right, ^^^^^ and i have to be honest, AMD GPU's are pretty sweet and cut it right at the very top, right now some might rightfuly argue that the 7970 GE is the fastest single GPU on earth.

But it is pretty bloody ironic that you need an Intel CPU to get the very best out of them in all situations, i even find it perversely amusing.

But that does not take way from the fact that AMD's CPU's offer good performance for not much money.

Perhaps one day they will once again be more competitive with Intel at the top end.

Piledriver was a 'Tick' all be it a decent one over Bulldozer, it really just fixed most of what was wrong with it and improved the performance a bit.

Steamroller is AMD's next 'Tok', 28nm and there should be a decent IPC improvement, 'excavator' <- oh Good Grief... not again with this construction machinery theme, is the next 'Gong' if there is to be a catch up with Intel at the top end that's it.



DG, its no good saying its slower over and over again and then continue to say it over and over again when the benchmarks prove otherwise;- while also complain about using those benchmarks which you would be all over constantly if they showed the Intel faster, your suiting your own agenda by making silly unsubstantiated blanket statements.

And its so obvious, you have some nerve i'll give you that, is this what the Intel camp is getting reduced to? fascinating.

BTW, you can't overclock your quoted CPU and its slower overall at the same price.

sorry your wrong


look at why amd priced it and what they priced it against ;) they priced it against this cpu (proven fact ask or write to amd if you dont believe me )
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CP-443-IN&groupid=701&catid=6&subcat=567 the reason was because the 8350 can beat that at same price.

it cant beat the i3570k so its not priced the same or more . if it was faster or better it would be priced accordingly ;) so no matter what people cry about a benchmark not this or that its priced to compete with similar cpus of similar speed.

i do agree in some benchmarks it does beat the 3570k and so on but overall with what we all use day to day and with current programs its slower in use.

blah blah its the programs that dont use the newr arcitecture blah blah irrelevant ! the i3570k is faster end of.

i can oc my cpu and im happy with my purchase as i know its faster than the slower alternative :)
 
So Martini1991 thnks it would go in the PD's favour.
Humbug thinks a win by 10% or so for the i5

Well i don't have a 3570K around to test on but i do have a 2500K' thats close enough.
And something with HT an ivy 3770K should do.

Just ripping an image now.
Got to get that transferred to a couple of machines.
 
So Martini1991 thnks it would go in the PD's favour.
Humbug thinks a win by 10% or so for the i5

Well i don't have a 3570K around to test on but i do have a 2500K' thats close enough.
And something with HT an ivy 3770K should do.

Just ripping an image now.
Got to get that transferred to a couple of machines.

The opposite way round to what many observers would engine :eek: :p

No, i do have a sneaking feeling the i5 might just have the edge clock for clock.
 
Last edited:
So Martini1991 thnks it would go in the PD's favour.
Humbug thinks a win by 10% or so for the i5

Well i don't have a 3570K around to test on but i do have a 2500K' thats close enough.
And something with HT an ivy 3770K should do.

Just ripping an image now.
Got to get that transferred to a couple of machines.

3770,FX83,25K

Is how I imagine it'll go.

Wouldn't want to stipulate on figures.

However, by your tone, I assume it may turn out differently? Which is also why I assume Humbug's saying the i5 and giving percentages to best the FX83 (Your tone)

That said, I recall someone posting that they couldn't fully load their CPU with handbrake? (Haven't the foggiest who it was, and I think it was with a 3930k?)
 
Last edited:
What I noticed with HB,the type of encode can change the relative positions of different CPUs.

I also noticed that with HB 0.9.6,the normal and high profile file sizes had noticeably changed from the previous versions as some major changes were made it seems.

Looking at some quick testing of a Phenom II X6 and a SB Core i5 in the HB thread I started on another forum ,in normal profile,the Core i5 2300 was ahead of a Phenom II X6 1055T. However,in high profile they were similar. A german site called HT4U noticed the same thing and this is why you can see relative differences in HB results between sites.
 
How many versions do you want me to use here.
I gave up using the 0.9.x series and use the nightly builds now.

Reason is they have sorted out the thread usage and i get 100% on 12 cores on the SB-E's.
A 50% increase in speed.

Hoping that will load the PD up nicely.
 
Back
Top Bottom