Yes he did, but there is no context any further than "Syria"
He could be opposed to the Assad regime, he could be opposed to the UKs bombing of Syria and the idea of potential civilian deaths as a result or he could even know a Sunni rebel that was caught in the crossfire somewhere.
Why does what he shouted automatically associate him with the Daesh ideals?
The conflict over there is EXTREMELY complicated, and far more than just "Daesh vs the West"
The Guardian is reporting an eye witness saying that attacker was performing a "sawing action" with the knife.
What the hell is a sawing action lol
Never sawed anything? It's a back and forth movement - I guess you probably have to use a sawing motion while beheading someone.
Not if the Saudi's have gifted you a special sword
Yes he did, but there is no context any further than "Syria"
He could be opposed to the Assad regime, he could be opposed to the UKs bombing of Syria and the idea of potential civilian deaths as a result or he could even know a Sunni rebel that was caught in the crossfire somewhere.
Why does what he shouted automatically associate him with the Daesh ideals?
The conflict over there is EXTREMELY complicated, and far more than just "Daesh vs the West"
(... anti-Western BS...)
The point I'm trying to make is that the word Terrorism is banded about without true context.
Saying people get stoned in Saudi Arabia is anti-Western?
Presumably you can prove that Saudi Arabia has executed someone for not being a Muslim?
#YouAintNoMuslimBruv - at least someone's got some common sense
I saw that on Twitter trend and it's a load of crap tbh and is just a sensationalist fad. Where common sense comes into this is anyone's guess. What gives them the right to call takfir on another Muslim? If you are a Muslim yourself then you are as dumb witted as the person who started trending that.
Condemn the act, yes! and understand the reason for their political or even personal motivation to carry it out.
#YouAintNoMuslimBruv - at least someone's got some common sense