Associate
- Joined
- 8 Apr 2015
- Posts
- 561
- Location
- Normally in the car
Looks like November from what I can see
LG 34GK950G, 3440x1440, G-Sync, 120Hz
- Thread starter Stu
- Start date
Looks like November from what I can see
Associate
- Joined
- 8 Apr 2015
- Posts
- 561
- Location
- Normally in the car
Is it true the Freesync one goes for 2019?
34GK950F is expected to be roughly £949.99 inc vat, launching in December I think
Daniel, I know you're talking about UK market but, do you know if will be the same for euro zone?
I mean, the 34GK950G you said will cost around 1100GBP, which is 1236€. Can we expect this price or will be boosted to 1399€ like somebody said? Thank you!
Associate
- Joined
- 8 Apr 2015
- Posts
- 561
- Location
- Normally in the car
No year, i didn't use the pound symbol
Thanks but does launching means there will be stock or have to wait for Q1 2019 as some said in here?
Associate
- Joined
- 8 Apr 2015
- Posts
- 561
- Location
- Normally in the car
I think I have stock incoming into UK warehouse in Dec, but depends on when as to whether we can get it into the channel
Dan
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
I currently have a dell 3008 wfp and have never played on a high hz monitor before. I'm thinking of either a 32inch 4k G-Sync @ 60hz or something like this. Is the IQ on a 4k that much greater than a lower res UW monitor? or is the jump in HZ worth the tradeoff in resolution. Either options would be paired with a 2080ti so plenty of horsepower.
Also, is it fair to say this is still using the older gen of g-sync modules where as the new 27inch 4k/144 with HDR (lite) are using a new version of the module?
Also, is it fair to say this is still using the older gen of g-sync modules where as the new 27inch 4k/144 with HDR (lite) are using a new version of the module?
Yeah, they've got a blind intern doing their product pages. Happens all the time on there.
My guess is that the price will be the same as in the UK.
I don't see any reason why it should be higher as long as you are in the EU(until they leave I guess).
UK prices pretty much matches the prices in Sweden at least. We might have slightly higher tax on electronics.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/9k3otp/nvidia_cards_reportedly_working_with_freesync_on/
I hope tftcentral talks about this in their upcoming comparison. Even if we don't know if it is
here to stay or not.
This is pretty relevant when choosing between the slightly better F version and the G version.
A lot of people here on overclockers seem well informed. Do you guys have any insightful opinions about this? Could it for example be that the GSync module has lower input lag then the F counterpart?
Or maybe I should ask the question like this:
If adaptive sync becomes a permanent thing on NVidia cards. Is there any reason to buy the G version over the F version?
I hope tftcentral talks about this in their upcoming comparison. Even if we don't know if it is
here to stay or not.
This is pretty relevant when choosing between the slightly better F version and the G version.
A lot of people here on overclockers seem well informed. Do you guys have any insightful opinions about this? Could it for example be that the GSync module has lower input lag then the F counterpart?
Or maybe I should ask the question like this:
If adaptive sync becomes a permanent thing on NVidia cards. Is there any reason to buy the G version over the F version?
Techreport updated their news piece a few hours after it was posted and it appears to be a false alarm. I can’t see NVIDIA cards supporting FreeSync at any time soon to be honest
“Update 9/30/18 3:22 AM: After further research and the collection of more high-speed camera footage from our G-Sync displays, I believe the tear-free gameplay we're experiencing on our FreeSync displays in combination with GeForces is a consequence of Windows 10's Desktop Window Manager adding some form of Vsync to the proceedings when games are in borderless windowed mode, rather than any form of VESA Adapative-Sync being engaged with our GeForce cards. Pending a response from Nvidia as to just what we're experiencing, I'd warn against drawing any conclusions from our observations at this time and sincerely apologize for any misleading conclusions we've presented in our original article. The original piece continues below for posterity.”
“Update 9/30/18 3:22 AM: After further research and the collection of more high-speed camera footage from our G-Sync displays, I believe the tear-free gameplay we're experiencing on our FreeSync displays in combination with GeForces is a consequence of Windows 10's Desktop Window Manager adding some form of Vsync to the proceedings when games are in borderless windowed mode, rather than any form of VESA Adapative-Sync being engaged with our GeForce cards. Pending a response from Nvidia as to just what we're experiencing, I'd warn against drawing any conclusions from our observations at this time and sincerely apologize for any misleading conclusions we've presented in our original article. The original piece continues below for posterity.”
For those who have been discussing the G model and whether the 120Hz overclock feature will lead to any problems later on in life...there’s been speculation about what is actually being overclocked and clearly the panel is capable of a native 144Hz here and so if anything is being “underclocked”. Which has lead to discussion about how it is the Gsync module that is being overclocked and people wondering if that would cause any problems later on in life.
My question is whether anyone has ever seen any specs or details which indicate that 120Hz is outside the capabilities of this particular GSync module? I can’t say I have. On older screens like the Dell alienware AW3418DW it was the Gsync module that made overclocking a 100Hz panel to 120Hz possible (and easy) but there was no indication that you were having to push BOTH the panel and Gsync module beyond their specs and defaults.
I am unsure why the G model seems to offer 120Hz only as an “overclock “ setting and that seems to be the only suggestion that maybe the Gsync module is needing to be pushed. I’m just curious if anyone has seen specs saying that the DP 1.2 module used has a lower limit?
My question is whether anyone has ever seen any specs or details which indicate that 120Hz is outside the capabilities of this particular GSync module? I can’t say I have. On older screens like the Dell alienware AW3418DW it was the Gsync module that made overclocking a 100Hz panel to 120Hz possible (and easy) but there was no indication that you were having to push BOTH the panel and Gsync module beyond their specs and defaults.
I am unsure why the G model seems to offer 120Hz only as an “overclock “ setting and that seems to be the only suggestion that maybe the Gsync module is needing to be pushed. I’m just curious if anyone has seen specs saying that the DP 1.2 module used has a lower limit?
Associate
- Joined
- 12 Aug 2018
- Posts
- 40
Damn, was hoping his review would be published earlier. But I know he only does this as a side thing as he has stated in this thread and also going on vacation.
Looking more forward to pcmonitors review than tftcentrals even if that too is going to be exciting.
Last edited:
I don't think any of us normal forum members have seen actual specs for the G-Sync module (I assume Nvidia keep details behind closed doors), but Daniel has said that the module needs to be overclocked to achieve 120Hz (quoted his post below).