LG 48CX OLED - 4K 120 Hz

SilverRST said:
If that's really the 42C2, then I would be disappointed big time because screw that stance. I hope it's the 42A2. The 48A1 got the crappy stance too.
Click to expand...
The 3 photos are 42", 55" and 65" C2 according to the text.

Edit: derp, what I mean is that 42" is a new size so they have likely designed a new stand. Which is what is in the photo.
 
LuckyBenski said:
Exactly, this is the implication. Although those are very basic feet, I wonder if they're a generic component as the final design hasn't been manufactured yet
Click to expand...
Let's hope that stand is for the A2 or B2 otherwise LG can go **** themself if that stand is for 42C2 too. Yeah, sorry for this kind of reply but we already have a LG tv with that kind of stand and it's ****** stupid. The stand like for C1 series is just fine. I wonder too (and I hope) that's not the final design because it looks cheap, way too cheap and hideous.
 
seth1969 said:
You sure about g-sync as it very smooth, no tear at all.
Click to expand...
G-Sync compat VRR should work over HDMI on Turing cards onwards so the 2080S should be fine though it would need either resolution lowered to 1440p or 2160p with colour compression to get 120Hz :)
 
old gamer said:
Odd my reply did not show in my post.
I have had problems with Netflix crashing but turning the tv off and unplugging it for a few seconds seems to sort it, thought it was my wi fi but could be down to the last update
Click to expand...
Thanks for the info:) I was watching Army of the Dead it was freezing and crashing back to home page 5 times, I reload Netflix app also turn off the TV at mains and held the power button. then turn it back on hope it fixed my problem!

TNA said:
Yep. I would prefer 32” but 42” fits perfectly fine on my desk and all I have to do is put it a little further away.
Click to expand...
You don't want to sit too close to an OLED like a LCD imo
 
Last edited:
seth1969 said:
You sure about g-sync as it very smooth, no tear at all.
Click to expand...
1080/2080s cards only came with a HDMI 2.0a/b so it's limited you won't get the 10bit only 8bit the output colour format will be set to YCbCr2.2.0 to get the 120hz @4K gaming
 
SilverRST said:
Out of curiosity, can you tell more about it?
Click to expand...
When I got my 55CX OLED in 2020 I sit 6/7ft away with HDR on/off without headache imo because it was much clearer, sharper, with the best IQ @4K that I have seen compare to my old LCD 4K, 42inch the ideal distance is seeing the whole screen without adjusting my eyes or turning my head of cause if you want to sit face close up that's your choice. It was debated on Reddit/Avforums.

Distance Calculator
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship

TNA said:
How comes? Many others have been for a few years now, not heard of any issues.
Click to expand...
Did I say it was an issue! What I said was 'IMO' and yes it was debated here too but on a 48inch OLED
 
Last edited:
AORUS said:
Did I say it was an issue! What I said was 'IMO' and yes it was debated here too but on a 48inch OLED
Click to expand...
What else is what you said meant to be if not an issue? I don't get it to be honest. You say stuff, then when called to explain you get upset :cry:

You said you don't want to sit too close to an OLED like a LCD. So what's the difference between OLED and LCD at same size screen that creates the issue is all I am asking. Simples.
 
There are rumours of the new C2 model, and the size being 42" !!!!!

I always liked the idea of using the tv as a monitor, but even 48 seems far too big, however 42 might be an excellent size! Should be fair bit cheaper too, at least RRP.
 
ZP9 said:
There are rumours of the new C2 model, and the size being 42" !!!!!

I always liked the idea of using the tv as a monitor, but even 48 seems far too big, however 42 might be an excellent size! Should be fair bit cheaper too, at least RRP.
Click to expand...

This was the contentious issue that normally makes sense (smaller display should equal cheaper to make/charge) but not necessarily so as it will be new and likely cost same as 48" unless on 'specials'.
 
gpuerrilla said:
This was the contentious issue that normally makes sense (smaller display should equal cheaper to make/charge) but not necessarily so as it will be new and likely cost same as 48" unless on 'specials'.
Click to expand...

Really hope you're wrong, but we shall see within the next few days
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom