^ he's referring to the additional Protect Plus cover (£140) which covers burn-in https://www.johnlewis.com/our-services/protect-plus
^ he's referring to the additional Protect Plus cover (£140) which covers burn-in https://www.johnlewis.com/our-services/protect-plus
Fair point but
what is not included
Meaning only normal use of the TV page 15 owners manual and the policy is provided by Domestic & General Insurance I am sure they will find away to get out of it or blame you.
- if you don’t follow the manufacturer’s instructions and/or installation guidelines.
- enhanced wall mount service for TV installation
Warranties, LG and Sony explicitly state that image retention and Burn-in is not covered as it is caused by consumer usage and is not a product defect
It's weird, everyone talks about burn in, but nobody has mentioned once you get it, if the TV is still usable or if it's really distracting? For example, I have a really old professional 32" here. It has lost some brightness since 2010, but we still use it to browse etc..
Has anybody in this thread attempted to return the CX to either JL or Currys having decided it wasn't for them? I.e. within the DSR period?
Would be interesting to know how much of a fuss either retailer kicks up.
Fair point but
what is not included
Meaning only normal use of the TV page 15 owners manual and the policy is provided by Domestic & General Insurance I am sure they will find away to get out of it or blame you.
- if you don’t follow the manufacturer’s instructions and/or installation guidelines.
- enhanced wall mount service for TV installation
Warranties, LG and Sony explicitly state that image retention and Burn-in is not covered as it is caused by consumer usage and is not a product defect
Following manufacturers guidance involves keeping features like image shift and pixel refresh enabled. There is a very strong argument that using a television as a television, to watch content etc. is the intended purpose of the product. If you are using the product for it's intended definition, in a regular consumer fashion (i.e. not as a store display running CNN 20 hours a day) and you get burn in after 2-3 years I find it very hard to believe the warranty would not be honoured. I would suggest small claims court might take a very similar view of "normal use of the TV" should the need arise.
Agree with companies sometimes trying to worm out of coughing up, D&G however have been ticking for 100+ years now and with LG and some retailers giving customers a £200 swap out panel (usually for banding issues not covered) hopefully we see less customer issues. Also people have gone to court and asked the judge if a £1500 TV should last 3 years ? or asked the judge should I not be allowed to watch BBC news for a few hours each day ? you can also say the TV was not fit for its intended purpose. Judge has sided with the customer usually. Before you do that though try complaining on the retailers social media Twitter/Facebook/Instagram etc page sometimes a public outcry gets results. Posting on Avforums is handy too you get many retailers there (richer sounds, john lewis) and they take more action when something publicly has gone wrong. I take screenshots of my TV settings with screen shift on, logo luminance high, cover your own back since no one else will !
Has anybody in this thread attempted to return the CX to either JL or Currys having decided it wasn't for them? I.e. within the DSR period?
Would be interesting to know how much of a fuss either retailer kicks up.
Fair point but
what is not included
Meaning only normal use of the TV page 15 owners manual and the policy is provided by Domestic & General Insurance I am sure they will find away to get out of it or blame you.
- if you don’t follow the manufacturer’s instructions and/or installation guidelines.
- enhanced wall mount service for TV installation
Warranties, LG and Sony explicitly state that image retention and Burn-in is not covered as it is caused by consumer usage and is not a product defect
I returned the 55" due to white uniformity issues - barely noticeable tbh but I had to accept it was simply too big, so downgrading to the 48" when they have stock.
I'm not sure John Lewis have a future - the returns process for a £1400 TV was too fast and efficient. Free collection, no testing done their end, prompt refund.
Thanks R3X. Yeah, I think I'll do the same and get it from JL when they have some stock.
Thanks nvars, I'll comment on your points in order:
1. That's a good point about the CX being too new to tell about an real and widespread burn in issues - I'll definitely buy it from JL and pay the extra for the insurance.
2. Thanks for letting me know about your settings around brightness.
3. On the text sharpness front, for the last 8 months while working from home (aside from a month or so between 2 G9's that I returned due to issues), I've sadly been making do with a 32" 1080p screen (~68 PPI), so I definitely hear you on the PPI front. If I went for the 55" then I'd put it on the wall so, given some room for mounting, it would be around 1.1m away from me (35cm further away than my 32" screen sits from me), so the effective PPI would be a significant step up vs the 32". If I got the 48" then I'd put it as far back on the desk as the stand will allow (so it will be about 85cm away from my eyes - 10cm further back than the 32"). My reasoning for not putting the 48" on the wall is that I think the text would get too small if I put it on the wall, either that or I'd need to increase zoom and lose real estate. Alright, so I just ran some calculations and the maths reveals something surprising; the effective PPI of the 55" on the wall at 1.1m away is better than the 48" on the desk at 85cm away. Based on that, I think whether or not I go for the 55" or 48" may come down to cost - although I am concerned about where I'd put my speakers if I get the 55" (I don't want to raise the 55" up since that my cause neck strain - meh, I'd figure it out).
4. My room is a touch bright first thing in the morning, but not so bad after that, so the glossy screen is a little concerning. As you say though, I could raise the brightness when I need to and if I do get screen burn (which hopefully I don't, since I'd want to be careful with it), I can make use the the insurance if it becomes an issue.
5&6. I hate chroma subsampling so I'd definitely make sure I run 4:4:4 at all times. Just as you suggest, for productivity I'd run 4k@60Hz, but for games, I'd planned to run it at 1440p@120Hz on my 2080 anyway. At some point around the beginning of next year, I'll look at either getting a 3080 or 6800XT (since I could swap out my 3950X for a 5950X and get an added performance boost with the 6800XT, whether I'll bother swapping out the 3950X remains to be seen though).
What is this issue? Gsync works without issue for me.
Thanks for this very helpful post. I think it's really just a question of seeing for myself how big of an issue this VRR Gamma shift issue is with my own eyes. As you say, the rest of the issues can hopefully be fixed with firmware updates, this is the only one that LG have confirmed is intrinsic to the OLED panel itself due to pixel design for 120hz and therefore not fixable with software.
Yeah I think it will depend how sensitive you are to this. Coming from LCD the blacks are so good that I didn't notice any problem - just how awesome everything looks. I've been playing doom eternal w/ g-sync and HDR and it just looks amazing. I've noticed zero issues. I'm guessing if I tried to look for it explicity I'd see it, somehow. I also couldn't find where LG says it is unfixable - the only official statement I found is that LG is aware of raised near-blacks in VRR, and implies it is an issue w/ g-sync itself - so present on all g-sync screens. Basically it sounds like a slight gamma shift due to g-sync's VRR implementation, but no one has described in detail as far as I can find. So I'm not sure if this means it's unfixable.
Regardless, it seems minor to me when every LCD tech has far worse contrast/blacks. I might change my mind though if I play a game where it is noticeable. I just bought Control in the halloween sale, so maybe I'll give that a whirl this weekend.
Here's Vincent as the source that broke the news from LG on it being a hardware issue rather than software:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfl3UdWZIUQ
The lifespan of an LG OLED is 100,000 hours (11 years of constant use) 2020 model and LG did say (It is rare for an average TV consumer to create an environment that could result in burn-in.) I hope LG is right and not just hype and all of you buy from JL extra cover will give you peace of mind hope so, the weird part is LG says constant use then says average use and some websites say normal use, it's an nightmare. In my opinion why did LG build a OLED TV for gamers if we have to limited playing games and streaming on a OLED
Say if you just play games and not change the content play 16 hours a day = 5,840 a year =64,240 in 11 years 35,760 left to use before the panel dies
Time will only tell
I'm happy to wait another couple of months for the CXI/C11, or see what other manufacturers are offering with HDMI 2.1 OLEDs.
I returned the 55" due to white uniformity issues - barely noticeable tbh but I had to accept it was simply too big, so downgrading to the 48" when they have stock.
I'm not sure John Lewis have a future - the returns process for a £1400 TV was too fast and efficient. Free collection, no testing done their end, prompt refund.