I really dont see the point of the 48 you pay more for a smaller screen, just move ur desk abit and use the 55
Or move it a bit further back and get the 65" .... repeat for 77"
I really dont see the point of the 48 you pay more for a smaller screen, just move ur desk abit and use the 55
I really dont see the point of the 48 you pay more for a smaller screen, just move ur desk abit and use the 55
Yeah and one also will get a better/higher PPI on the 48 incher. But that also true, pay more for a smaller screen is kind a dumb. But the upcoming (2020) model 48 will do 4K @120hz. The C9 only do it in 1440P right ?
It’s been a long wait with more to comefingers crossed 77'' gets a 1.5k price drop lol
C9 supports 4K/120hz with a firmware patch at some point this year hopefully. Right now it is 4K/60hz
the 9 series support 4k@120 but as there is no HDMI 2.1 capable hardware to use it, yet.
900 Euros blimey and I though £1299 was a good buy. Would love the 55" (as main TV) but no way could I get it past the missus.I have been using the 55c9 as my monitor for a while, and I dont know why I didnt do it sooner, it`s just miles beyond anything monitors offer at the moment, and for 900€ it`s not that expensive either.
.
So how far back are desktop users of the c9 sitting?
Still considering one of these but the furthest back I can be from a normal position is about 42 inches (3.5 feet / 106cm) with my current desk.
900 Euros blimey and I though £1299 was a good buy. Would love the 55" (as main TV) but no way could I get it past the missus.
900 Euros blimey and I though £1299 was a good buy. Would love the 55" (as main TV) but no way could I get it past the missus.