Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
That's my thinking, a lot less stressful on gfx power for sacrificing the res BUT the 3440*1440 looks extremely sweet AND is again a power less stressful than 4k would be!! (4.95 million pixels to push vs 8.3)
Let's face it, the UM95 is a monitor for 4-5 years easy, and I don't want to regret getting a lower res version for the sake of a bit of a saving now. Decisions decisions....
Thank you for the pic Robbie, it helped to sway me to spend more money
Will probably wait now til their's a bit of competition around (Dell etc) and to iron out any possible bugs with the tech. Ultrawide is my next near-future purchase for sure
My 30" will last me a touch longer (we're celebrating our 3.5 year anniversary, I think we'll split by our 4th )
Let's face it, the UM95 is a monitor for 4-5 years easy, and I don't want to regret getting a lower res version for the sake of a bit of a saving now. Decisions decisions....
Thank you for the pic Robbie, it helped to sway me to spend more money
Will probably wait now til their's a bit of competition around (Dell etc) and to iron out any possible bugs with the tech. Ultrawide is my next near-future purchase for sure
My 30" will last me a touch longer (we're celebrating our 3.5 year anniversary, I think we'll split by our 4th )
Last edited: