Kell_ee001 said:
I don't tend to buy these magines but they are often around the house. You'll see that the mags that perpetuate the stereotype are selling so much because they all claim to tell you how
you can become part of that stereotype too!
Realistically though it is very hard to get that figure, and when women fail they feel worse for it
It's not that hard, just to what huge amount of supermodels do and stuff large amounts of coke up your nose. The whole thing about supermodels is it's a unnatural and unnaturally atainable figure, it's a case of you either have that figure or you don't, my Ex had it, she was about a size 6/8 and 6 foot tall, and had had modelling contracts thrown at her for years, but her mum was the same ad her sister who was a proper catwalk model was the same too, she was that size beacuse of the way she was built, she was a very waif like creature, but many people are not built like that.
My best two best mates gf's who are both stunning could never be that thin, because their build is not right for it, neither could some of my mates at work who are equaly stunning.
The problem of womens magazines is self perpetuating, and has as little to do with men as possible, they constantly criticise others to make hemselfs feel better about themselfs, and women swallow it by the bucket load, so at the end of the day it's womens own fault, as you are the ones buying it so perpetuatng this image when most men aren't all that bothered.
Look at mens magazines full of cruvy women to the brim, look at FHM or whatever and it's not full of uber skinny birds it full of normal looking women, on any given day (when it's not raining) i could have have walked through Bristol and could find you 50 women who are as good looking as anything in FHM and all that, it's just well anyone looks great when they have a few grands worth of computer software used on them.
