lol tvlicensing
- Thread starter arknor
- Start date
You guys know you can just phone the TV licence people and inform them that you no longer watch TV.
It's really very easy it took me about 30 seconds and spoke to a very nice sounding lady who's response was simply 'OK, you are now off the listing, have a nice day'.
It's really very easy it took me about 30 seconds and spoke to a very nice sounding lady who's response was simply 'OK, you are now off the listing, have a nice day'.
Associate
- Joined
- 23 May 2006
- Posts
- 558
Who are you to say that everything is wrong on that site ? What is wrong exactly ? Can you provide proof that its wrong ? Are you saying the Crown is not a corporation and that some councils and police departments aren't owned by private corporations ? County courts are corporations, it's money money money!
This is a taxing country to make loads of money, what right do the TVL authority have to come into my home to check if I have a TV ? Its a private corporation and i have no contract with them to have a TVL. It's becoming like german's looking for jews over again.
It's like me buying cheese from Tesco's, Only I stop buying it and then I have Tesco's harassing me why I have not bought cheese from them. I do not have a contract with them to buy cheese.
This is a taxing country to make loads of money, what right do the TVL authority have to come into my home to check if I have a TV ? Its a private corporation and i have no contract with them to have a TVL. It's becoming like german's looking for jews over again.
It's like me buying cheese from Tesco's, Only I stop buying it and then I have Tesco's harassing me why I have not bought cheese from them. I do not have a contract with them to buy cheese.
But if you kept receiving that cheese they would be right. Which is what the TV licence is all about. If you receive the product or service, you pay for it. If you don't, then you can ignore any further interactions with Tesco or TV Licensing.
Watching live TV is the service, which has to be paid for, by law.
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 22,395
- Location
- Wilds of suffolk
Don't post stuff then ask someone else to prove its wrong, thats not how reasoned debate works.
Prove one, any one at all, of those things are correct.
Just one
Please
This is hilarious... the same thing happened on the money thread - some conspiraloon comes along makes outrageous statements/posts silly youtube videos/links to dodgy websites... when asked to justify/back up their claims they attempt to switch the burden of proof and ask that the claims they are making are instead proved wrong... or that you do some googling yourself as though you'll suddenly see the light/share their rather silly view of how the world works.
Associate
- Joined
- 23 May 2006
- Posts
- 558
Check on your birth certificate, it's owned by the Crown copyright which is a corporation which in other words your name is owned by the Crown.
Last edited:
I thought that the OP in this thread was slightly wacky, but wow.
Crown copyright means that the documents created by the Crown are copyrighted. You cannot copy a birth certificate without permission. It does not mean that the name on a birth certificate is copyrighted.
If the country is all about money, then why is there such a big budget deficit?
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 22,395
- Location
- Wilds of suffolk
No it doesn't mean that at all
It means if you happen to have the same name as someone who is older than you that they can sue you for copyright infringement. I thought everyone knew this
Associate
- Joined
- 23 May 2006
- Posts
- 558
The guy just said everything was wrong, in what way ? he could have expanded on what he put but he didn't. It's obvious what's going on in this country but it seems we have slaves who are totally ignorant to it
Care to explain what's going on in the country, then?
Associate
- Joined
- 23 May 2006
- Posts
- 558
We pay road tax but roads don't get repaired, why ? because it gets spent else where and then they moan they don't have enough money. The money we all pay in gets shifted around.
When a person is born in Britain, the mother and father submit a Birth Certificate Registration Form, which is a piece of paper. There is no requirement under common law to do this.
When any limited company or corporation is set up, there is always a Certificate of Registration in order to create it’s LEGAL PERSONALITY and that is a piece of paper. Please note that a British Birth Certificate states quite clearly that it is not evidence of identity, that means that, it has nothing to do with any human. Marked on it is “Crown Copyright” showing clearly that it does not belong to an individual and was created by the crown.
This act of Registering a child, makes that child a “ward of the court” and the child can be taken away from the parents at any time. The Legalese definitions of words which sound commonplace, can be found in Black's Law Dictionary.
When a person is born in Britain, the mother and father submit a Birth Certificate Registration Form, which is a piece of paper. There is no requirement under common law to do this.
When any limited company or corporation is set up, there is always a Certificate of Registration in order to create it’s LEGAL PERSONALITY and that is a piece of paper. Please note that a British Birth Certificate states quite clearly that it is not evidence of identity, that means that, it has nothing to do with any human. Marked on it is “Crown Copyright” showing clearly that it does not belong to an individual and was created by the crown.
This act of Registering a child, makes that child a “ward of the court” and the child can be taken away from the parents at any time. The Legalese definitions of words which sound commonplace, can be found in Black's Law Dictionary.
That dictionary seems to suggest that 'Understand' doesn't mean to 'stand under'.
Why?
http://thelawdictionary.org/understand/
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 22,395
- Location
- Wilds of suffolk
This only applies if you refuse to accept that Acts are law.
Seeing as there have been numerous Births and Deaths acts in the uk
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 22,395
- Location
- Wilds of suffolk
We do not pay road tax by the way.
It doesn't exist.
Please try harder to come up with something that takes more than 15 seconds to throw out as incorrect
I once read something on one of these websites that was trying to calculate the value to the UK of a person, and came up with £32mn. They made two massive errors: 1) they were using USD figures, 2) they assumed that a 'billion' was a long billion - making their calculations out by a factor of 1500!
You know when such a blatant error like that occurs that they are finding and distorting 'facts' to fit their distorted perspective. Starting with the conclusion, then finding the evidence to support it.
You know when such a blatant error like that occurs that they are finding and distorting 'facts' to fit their distorted perspective. Starting with the conclusion, then finding the evidence to support it.
Yes, it does. What's your point?
It's required under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953 s1. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/1-2/20/section/1
Correct. What's your point.
As above, that means that the document itself is copyrighted by the Crown - you cannot copy it without permission. An "idea", in this case a name, cannot be copyrighted, only the fixation of that idea. See the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 S3(2), and Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539.
Source?
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 13,052
- Location
- london
I know the freeman arguments but I don't use them against the tv license. If i phone up the tv license people, they won't do anything without my name. If i tell them I don't have a tv, they will send someone to verify that and I will have to consent to a search of my property. My principles on liberty do not allow for me to consent to a search of my property. There is every indication that engaging with the tv license gangsters will lead to more problems and waste more of my time, than just ignoring them.
I have heard that if you give them your name and tell them, they will send an harassment agent around every 12 months to search your property for any infringing items. In some cases it does not even stop the letters.
I have heard that if you give them your name and tell them, they will send an harassment agent around every 12 months to search your property for any infringing items. In some cases it does not even stop the letters.
I wonder if there is a face palm big enough for this.
The document style/layout is copyrighted and property of the Crown.
Basically the same as any documention produced by the Government is likely to be protected by copyright in some form or another.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 13,052
- Location
- london
The freeman argument says that because the birth certicate and the name is in all caps, that represents the legal fiction of yourself. the birth certifcate is then akin to registering a company in the name of the person. The argument is that you were too young to consent to that and it does not represent the person but a legal fiction. It is the legal fiction that has to follow the acts and not the real person.
Also there is the argument that since 1911 parliament act all acts of parliament have been invalid because they changed the way the laws come in to be and adjusted the power of the parliament away from the lords. If i understand correctly. All these acts since then like driving license and telecommunications act etc. Are all invalid as they don't supersede common law.
Also there is the argument that since 1911 parliament act all acts of parliament have been invalid because they changed the way the laws come in to be and adjusted the power of the parliament away from the lords. If i understand correctly. All these acts since then like driving license and telecommunications act etc. Are all invalid as they don't supersede common law.