Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Jul 2011
- Posts
- 4,418
- Location
- Cambridgeshire
No I'm suggesting that the cuts in policing numbers has had no effect on counter-terror effectiveness, or if it has then the police have their priorities wrong.
This is kind of the point though isn't it? After a certain level of funding reduction, when reasonable efficiencies have been achieved, the question becomes "Well what would you like us to stop doing?". Like it or not but trolling is high profile at the moment, therefore the Police react to political and public pressure by assigning resources, though I doubt in the scheme of things that the resources assigned to cyber bullying are that significant, during times of austerity that comes at a cost. One of those costs is undoubtedly Police on the ground, another comes in the form of high ranking officers within individual forces saying that they don't have the resources to investigate certain crimes effectively anymore.
In addition a terrorism response doesn't just rely on areas funded through anti-terrorism grants. It relies on front lines officers, it relies on first responders, it relies on having the resource available in the right place, reporting infrastructure, the ability to staff secondary services. You're over simplifying by suggesting all is well because more money has been allocated to counter terrorism.