Yes that *is* what he's saying.What?
Are you saying a parent who would keep an eye on their kids 24/7 and doesn't value cheap fingerfoods and fake friends more than the child, is a misfortune unto the child????
Yes that *is* what he's saying.What?
Are you saying a parent who would keep an eye on their kids 24/7 and doesn't value cheap fingerfoods and fake friends more than the child, is a misfortune unto the child????
[BILE]
I am saying that people like you really should get out a bit; the vasectomy clinic might be a sensible first destination . . . although it is probably only of academic interest to you.[BILE]
You seem to base your entire world view on what you read in the Daily Mail.
I am saying that people like you really should get out a bit; the vasectomy clinic might be a sensible first destination . . . although it is probably only of academic interest to you.
There is a difference between keeping a good eye on your kids and being an obsessive parent who seeks to monitor and control their every move assuming that is what Stockhausen is hinting at.
How old was maddie when she was abandoned then?
I'm sure she wasn't some teenager who was begging for independence or anything. I am fully aware of too much control can have on a child's psyche, especially in adolescence. Heck I think I know more about psychology than stockhousen.
So which category do the Mcanns fall into? Since Stockhausen knows nothing about the rest of us, we can only really be discussing what he thinks of the Mcanns leaving their kids.There is a difference between keeping a good eye on your kids and being an obsessive parent who seeks to monitor and control their every move assuming that is what Stockhausen is hinting at.
Doesn't read like that at all. Sounded like you were in complete agreement with Stockhausen.My point was in support (I think) of yours - assuming he was inferring that keeping a close eye on your kid always equated to suffocating them or a bit creepy.
I'm sorry you're totally right.My point was in support (I think) of yours - assuming he was inferring that keeping a close eye on your kid always equated to suffocating them or a bit creepy.
Doesn't read like that at all. Sounded like you were in complete agreement with Stockhausen.
Hardly something to praise and admire. Unless we decide who we agree with based on who can be the biggest jerk.lol! One of the best put downs I've seen for a while
Don’t start that guff again, and let’s not make things personal guys.Heck I think I know more about psychology than stockhousen.
Don’t start that guff again, and let’s not make things personal guys.
In switzerland you see children who look around 7 years old taking the bus and going to school by themselves in England it would probably be considered child neglect.My point was in support (I think) of yours - assuming he was inferring that keeping a close eye on your kid always equated to suffocating them or a bit creepy.