[MAFIA] The Thirteen Doctors

can i just pointed out i passed my English language GCSE with a C, the grade boundary for a c was 120 and i got 119 and they gave me mercy. I suck with punctuation and grammar and my clarification had not of it so it made no sense when i read it back
 
can i just pointed out i passed my English language GCSE with a C, the grade boundary for a c was 120 and i got 119 and they gave me mercy. I suck with punctuation and grammar and my clarification had not of it so it made no sense when i read it back

You're lucky the theme is Doctor Who and not Grammar Nazis. Or you'd be very dead.
 
That's a fair comment, at the moment there are two people I suspect, Psymonkee has been incredibly quiet on both days and iviv made a strange post yesterday:



Based on what I would call an assault on Shami today I would say that post has a little bit of double standards thrown in, especially when iviv says to take him on his word that he's Town. On day 1 I was quite happy to have somebody vocal, trying to steer the game in a positive direction for the town but as time goes on I'm wondering whether this is a massive diversion. For me it's entirely possible that iviv is over playing the pro-town card, we know he isn't the cop (assuming there is only one cop in this game) so he probably doesn't have any insider information as to who people are.

I've also been consistent with one thing I have kept saying, and that is that I am still looking at other options. There are 3-4 scum out there, any time a bandwagon is starting, the scum will want to jump on to score themselves another kill, except if it is on one of their own. This is why votes are important early as well at throughout the vote period. Once you reach the end of the game, you can go back through previous votes, see who different people voted for. Did one player always join on bandwagons in the middle or near the end, except when it was on people who were lynched as scum? Who wasn't involved in the scum lynches? Things like that are key information, and that's why I voted early, both today and yesterday.

The above two quotes go together because they are extremely relevant. iviv talks about hunting down the mafia, then decides to vote for Shami because he's a distraction. Now that is a fact. That is evidence I can base an opinion on. That is why I say:

##vote iviv

As above, I have repeatedly stated that I am still looking at other options (And mentioned Brabbinho as I was suspicious of him from Day 1 as well). By voting on someone early, it forces discussion (And indeed we finally got some content out of Shamikebab, a post which I will comment on later). But lets have a look at the majority of his early game posts:

I'd hardly say I was lurking. It's day one, there is nothing to go on at the moment so it's just people blind firing out votes. We have plenty of time so there is no need to vote someone based on their facial hair yet.

Sure, but there is not a lot to discuss at the moment really.

And i say there is no such thing as a well reasoned Day 1 lynch. I've already said it's needed but lets not kid ourselves that it's anything other than random.

People need to defend themselves sure....how exactly? People's votes are dubious at best and down right random at worst, no defense is possible against a vote without justification.

That's not really a case at all, it's just blind guessing. Pretending it's anything other than that at this stage is ridiculous.

Incorrect.

Several people have posted guesses about how they guess they feel about people at this point. Pretending it is anything other than that is ignorant.

Everyone else has been contributing, analysing posts, discussing what has happened, even on day 1. Your attitude was simply 'There is no information' despite the fact that the posts everyone was making were information. Look at who people discuss. Myself and a couple of others even posted reads on the other players dissecting their posts during that first day, while you couldn't see anything at all and then admit you only go with the majority to lynch rather than having a reason behind it? I had already stated in my read that fortyseven seemed a little suspicious, and while he did turn out to be the cop, my vote had reason behind it rather than being a 'follow the crowd and vote because we need a lynch' vote. And while your vote was important for us to at least gain information, I had some conviction behind mine. Wrongly placed, but I tried.

And again, I make the comparison back to Fortyseven in the previous game. A flawed action on day one and the rest of the game was twisted. Each day he was kept alive, each day the townies kept second guessing themselves, is he really a townie or was he scum and making a scum move? Unless someone else does something to appear more scummy than you, you are currently the biggest target on my radar because your early game reeks of scum play, not giving anything away, not giving any input, then bringing down the hammer under the pretext of not having anything against the guy, we just have to have a lynch.
From this point on, there will be a constant doubt. Are you just a townie who made a stupid move, or are you really scum. Either way you will be a distraction throughout the game. And if we don't have a more likely scum target, I believe it is you.

well shamikebab, that is quite a thorough analysis of what has happened, and i am inclined to agree on most of it. the point about the "alliance" is quite true, they are swaying the town, they push for lynches and get them on....townies, admittedly i joined, but i was swayed and tbh we did need a lynch. the problem with this is that all the mafia have to do is sit back and wait for the "alliance" to their job for them and kill innocent townies, while the mafia kill of even more townies. This is assuming the "alliance" isn't mafia, if the "alliance" is mafia, then they are playing one hell of a game forcing through lynches and then NK'S (i now know what this actually means :D:D) if special roles didnt come into play.

I have been against Shamikebab since day 1 with the way he has been posting. The fact that someone else is agreeing with me and posting with equal fervour is a little worrying, and I am certainly not going to start simply agreeing with everything he says purely because he agrees with me. As I have stated before, starting a vote early gets discussion really going. People are now voting and showing what they believe, whereas if there hadn't been votes cast, would there be anywhere near this level of discussion and analysis? I doubt it. I have no intention of killing innocent townies, and my posts are naturally just my opinion from what I am reading out of people's posts. Of course I may be wrong, and that is the point of this game. As a group we have to figure out who the scum is, they won't volunteer the information themselves.



I do not expect anyone to follow all of my posts blindly. If that were to happen it would hardly be a game. Everything I state is my opinion and my interpretation behind what I am seeing being posted by everyone on here. In return, we need everyone else to do the same. Another player may pick up on something subtle that everyone else misses, and that's why I would encourage people to do analysis's of everyone else's posts throughout the game.
 
I have to say Iviv, going back through the thread I see a lot of posts from you on how to play the game, but not a huge amount about the actual players.

You were wrong about 47. I'm not putting that all on you, but you were. Now you're falling out with Shami because he's a distraction, not because you think he's a mafia. It's just as easy to see that as anti-town as Shami's posts.

But then I also get where Shami is coming from - in preparation I read up on a load of mafia games, from a whole bunch of sites. The only games I saw the town do well was when they'd played together a lot (like getting used to a poker players tells I guess) or when town communicated outside of the thread.

We haven't played a lot. You may have a wealth of experience on the mechanics, but you don't know how the players interact in this group. I'm guessing most of you didn't even know I existed before the last game :D

Shami doesn't like being told what to do - I get that. He may have been a bit aggressive about it, but then so have you been. He helped you lynch 47 when you said we needed a lynch. He doesn't like Chris for the same reason - and to be fair, neither did I - but then to be fair to Chris, I challenged him on it and he pulled back.

So far, I have Egon, Chris, Shami and you as town - but to me, you are becoming as much of a distraction as Shami.

I have Pookie and Leprechaun as mafia - Brabhino I'm suspicious of.

The rest I'm neutral to at the minute, but would class as town for now.

All fair points. However as per my post above, someone must start a vote to generate discussion. My votes in day 1 went from Psy to Leprechaun312 both as joke votes in the early stage before I targeted Shamikebab for his attitude right on day one. I only changed away from that because of we were running out of time and it was clear that he was not going to get the 7 votes needed for a majority, so I switched to the person receiving votes that I felt was most likely to be scum. I would rather have tried to convince people on Shami on day 1, however since nobody was going to be online at the time the vote closed, there was little choice.
 
You keep saying there has been all this discussion and analysis...looking at it there really hasn't. Nearly all the votes on day one were blind guesses and there was so much reversing it was quite clear. I was consistent day one because day one is a guessing game, I stick by that. You have said everyone else has been contributing, I say they haven't. You voted for four different people yesterday, just blind firing possibly to distract the town as much as possible. It doesn't matter how many times you say "oh look we got 400 posts, so much information" we got absolutely nothing out of day one but a dead cop. If you push through today and get another townie killed it's just going to show either you are mafia or you are dominating a town really badly.
 
i have challenged other people in the same way, chricubed in the very beginning


i then responded with the same answer i gave to you when i questioned your vote on pookie

i then kept at Chris until i was convinced he was a townie, i still do. if anything i gave you an easier time like 2-3 posts over your vote on pookie whereas my questioning of chris lasted the entirety of day one until you voted pookie.

Your first post - sorry man, but I'm not considering that a serious defence of another player.

Good afternoon ladies, i have recieved my trust message, sorry the for the let reply i was just of on Galifrey for a wee stroll :D:D:D

whats with the early lynching, Psymonkee hasn't really done anything to hit he's a dirty rotten scumbeeeegggg

iviv i've got my screwdriver set to stab :D:D

Next one I'll give you - still very early on

I'm not defending him, i just want to know why he is being voted, it just looks like iviv has voted him because he wasn't too fussed on playing

To Chris - about his defence of himself

hhhmmmmmmm..........

To Shami

that might be due to the 5 votes on him at one point and him frantically trying to defend himself

To me:

whats wrong with my town credentials? is it the fact their drawn in crayon :D:D

on a serious note, what is it about me that you can't put your finger on?

NOTE: bolded bit below is a broken quote from me (see how I don't misrepresent ;)). I had to remove Leprechaun's dangling end quote because it broke the flow of this

that is purely down to coincidence except for this time, i saw pookie asking for a reason, thought i would too

Honestly, I have nothing solid to go on. Leprechaun's vote for Chris was a little out of nowhere - Pookie, you've been quite back and forth on lynching. Vague things, I know. It just niggles...imagine you had a seed stuck in your teeth...that kind of niggle :D

Fair enough, I understand it is day one, everyone has the same niggles

hmm... you see you have just voted for pookie, pookie was voted for by 47 who has just been voted for by pudney, suspicious that you would follow someone currently very suspicious

very suspicious may have been an over statement, i don't actually know either way with 47 whether he is townie or a scumbeeeegggggg. what i meant was why are you voting pookie when 47 has just voted for pookie. you gave no reasons and it looks as if you are supporting 47 who already looks suspicious (to others)

also i'm not defending pookie, vote him if you want. you just havent given a reason and it looks suspicious,

no you're not the dodgiest guy in town It just looked suspicious to me as you gave no reaaon. now you have my suspicion is gone apologies for looking like I'm hammering you

I don't see any others where you defend another player - if I've missed them, throw them up there man - but I am not going all the way through this £$%&ing thread again :D


And also:

im inclined to agree until there is more evidence I can't vote either

Except you already had - and unvoted.

let me clarify my clarification where i say "Saying i'm scum" i mean "saying that you have a suspicion of me"

Shovel?

and i even manage to spell point wrong, aswell as saying not instead of none

like i said earlier, let me go hang myself :(:(

I'd appreciate it, thanks man :p
 
You keep saying there has been all this discussion and analysis...looking at it there really hasn't. Nearly all the votes on day one were blind guesses and there was so much reversing it was quite clear. I was consistent day one because day one is a guessing game, I stick by that. You have said everyone else has been contributing, I say they haven't. You voted for four different people yesterday, just blind firing possibly to distract the town as much as possible. It doesn't matter how many times you say "oh look we got 400 posts, so much information" we got absolutely nothing out of day one but a dead cop. If you push through today and get another townie killed it's just going to show either you are mafia or you are dominating a town really badly.

So what do you suggest we do? Sit down and twiddle our thumbs until someone admits they are scum? How should day 1 have gone, who should we have killed out of the 13 players? How would we have avoided killing the cop when you say it's completely random? Should we have simply no lynched despite the fact that it is mathematically the worst option?


And remember what I posted earlier on in this day. Whoever has a night action now has a lot of information, especially those who are investigators and those who are protectors. The protector knows who they protected. They survived therefore they know whoever they targeted is town. Equally if someone investigated that person and discovered the investigation failed, that likely means there was a jailer who both blocked the night kill and the investigation, and by that train of logic whoever they investigated is also town.

Again, I add the reminder that there may be redirection in place, so these results could have equally been redirected. Or we could have a lightning rod who attracted both the protection and the night kill, so the above isn't set in stone, but it is a solid foundation to start on.
 
At no point did I say no lynch, in fact I said the opposite a few times. Stop trying to put words in my mouth. What we have in day one is post and vote overload, it makes it very hard to analyse voting patterns and interactions, making it a lot harder for the town.
 
At no point did I say no lynch, in fact I said the opposite a few times. Stop trying to put words in my mouth. What we have in day one is post and vote overload, it makes it very hard to analyse voting patterns and interactions, making it a lot harder for the town.

Again, who should we have killed? How would you propose we avoid killing the cop when you yourself said it was random chance?
 
Your first post - sorry man, but I'm not considering that a serious defence of another player.
thats because it isnt, i wasnt defending was just asking for explanation

To Chris - about his defence of himself
this was me thinking of unvoting chris, which i did later on

I don't see any others where you defend another player - if I've missed them, throw them up there man - but I am not going all the way through this £$%&ing thread again :D
Because, as i have stated many times before most people gave reasons that made sense for their votes, where they didnt or where i could actually be bother asking i asked for a reason like i asked you. you showed it with my first post and the post to you, look at my posts to you i literally just say its suspicious when you voted with no explanation, you gave one and i laid off and all the way through i said i wasnt defending pookie, i'm not, other people voted for pookie.

killswitch did, he gave reasons didnt jump on him, chriscubed did however i did respond to and vote him, but it wasnt specifically because he voted pookie. It was due to his votes on a number of lurkers and stuff (i cba going back again and finding my reasons, you want them go find them they are there and they arent to do with pookie specifically) i still dont find your reasons for pointing the finger at me and to be honest i really cant be ****ed answering you accusation anymore as its clear you dont brush your teeth enough to get that niggle out. Take whatever view you want, vote me or don't
nah doesnt look like i'll need one
 
Waiting for Iviv's megapost, then I'll put my cards on the table.

This just feels like the Shamikebab witch hunt to me:

##vote iviv

Was this your cards on the table?

Currently my thoughts are this:

1) This whole Shami/iviv/Chris argument looks like townies arguing amongst themselves.
2) I'd expect at least one mafia to stir, in the past game this was done with 47 by both myself and Shami on different days.
3) I'm not sure what K1LLSW1TCH has actually helpfully posted in the last 4 pages (I got bored of going further back) - it's mostly jokes and defence on Shami.

I would really like to hear K1LLSW1TCH's "cards on the table" unless he meant he was just waiting to vote for iviv.
 
i still dont find your reasons for pointing the finger at me and to be honest i really cant be ****ed answering you accusation anymore as its clear you dont brush your teeth enough to get that niggle out. Take whatever view you want, vote me or don't

Fair enough man. But at least you can't argue that I didn't try to explain.

Take whatever view you want, vote me or don't

You're totally right - if I'm going to bust your balls I should stand up to my convictions.

##vote Leprechaun
 
Again, who should we have killed? How would you propose we avoid killing the cop when you yourself said it was random chance?

As I've said it didn't matter. It was a guess whatever happened. You're one the one trying to claim that you're some big guardian angel who is training is all and I'm saying it's done jack squat in day one and it's heading the same way in day 2. You're all talk and minimal useful output. In the end your huge plans for day one resulted in the worst possible outcome.
 
Back
Top Bottom