Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 75,901
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
He meant that ! ![Big Grin :D :D](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin :D :D](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/biggrin.gif)
You wouldn't think so if you were on the receiving end of one of those.
All that says is, we have a player who over exaggerates contact and that berbatov still dived, completely seperate incidents and each should be assessed on individual merit, completely pointless arguement.
Contact made in the match yesterday, no contact made on Saint Stevie in some of the others. Glass houses and all that
Luckiest goal ever?
SKL4WxTqHz
In which case a red would be fair if he caught him square. But he got to the ball first.
In which case a red would be fair if he caught him square. But he got to the ball first.
I like it when people say this.
Go read the rules, getting the ball doesn't some how make it all okay.
I think the red card was a red card going on the rules but to be honest I think the rules are a bit harsh. I think a booking would have been okay for that tackle.
Contact made in the match yesterday, no contact made on Saint Stevie in some of the others. Glass houses and all that
Contact was minimal
Contact was minimal to non existent and berba took another few steps.
Anyhoo, coming back with 'Gerrard dives', is completely irrelevant, it does not make it fair for berbatov to do it and each match/incident is treated separately. He cheated, we have reason to whine.
Is this the make **** up method of analysing decisions?Contact was minimal to non existent and berba took another few steps.
Contact was minimal to non existent and berba took another few steps.
Anyhoo, coming back with 'Gerrard dives', is completely irrelevant, it does not make it fair for berbatov to do it and each match/incident is treated separately. He cheated, we have reason to whine.