The funny thing is IDS resigned voluntarily, which means he'll have to wait up to 26 weeks before he can claim his JSA.
I'm sure he'll be counting down the hours, while he eats his cold baked beans with a dirty spoon
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
The funny thing is IDS resigned voluntarily, which means he'll have to wait up to 26 weeks before he can claim his JSA.
I feel slightly warmed that ****ing over the poor, the disabled, and families with kids (of all income levels) doesn't win votes.
The funny thing is IDS resigned voluntarily, which means he'll have to wait up to 26 weeks before he can claim his JSA.
Why's that now?
Never heard of this Crabb fellow before.
Ermm no, he is still an MP and paid as such.
I don't understand your point. That pensioner has most likely worked for 30 years +. Why begrudge their payments?
Sorry to bring this point back up ultralaser after it died down but I wanted to share some interesting charts from the grauniad the other week, with the stupidly titled:
Who's winning? Find out how your income compares with every other generation
Half way down the page are charts for average earnings for age groups in various countries. Notice that average earnings for 60+ year olds have been growing most rapidly here (apart from maybe France) and earnings for most other groups have dropped, especially dramatically for under 30s.
I agree with your sentiment that we shouldn't cut pensions willy-nilly, but if the elderly are majorly cashing in from a combination of generous pension rises and extreme property value growth, then maybe it's justified.
Your suggestion that they've earned it so they should get whatever rises are coming to them presumes that they somehow earned it more than any pensioners in the past, which I don't see any logic for.
Ermm no, he is still an MP and paid as such.
Nothing mentioned about the Government proposing to sell the remaining shares in RBS at a loss of almost £22 billion – recouping barely half the £45.5bn poured in to save the bank from collapsing in 2008.
Corbyn is ahead in the polls for the first time. All the Tories had to do was look competent and the next election would be in the bag. Looks like they've screwed that up.![]()
But it's not elections anytime soon.
Nothing mentioned about the Government proposing to sell the remaining shares in RBS at a loss of almost £22 billion – recouping barely half the £45.5bn poured in to save the bank from collapsing in 2008.
There's two fairly significant votes this year - the EU referendum and the London mayoral election. Zac Goldsmith is trying his hardest to tie Sadiq Khan to Jeremy Corbyn. That could backfire if Khan wins.
In other words as soon as Corbyn goes and there's a valid opposition the better it is for the uk.
If to be considered a "valid" opposition means a choice between Tories and Red Tories then I'm not particularly interested in this idea of "making Labour electable".
If to be considered a "valid" opposition means a choice between Tories and Red Tories then I'm not particularly interested in this idea of "making Labour electable".