![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
You don't get 'charged' with an offence that doesn't exist.
If a verdict of accidental death is recorded, they won't be 'charged' for killing her. However, such a verdict is highly unlikely whatever happened.
McCanns going too far?
- Thread starter Moley
- Start date
You don't get 'charged' with an offence that doesn't exist.
If a verdict of accidental death is recorded, they won't be 'charged' for killing her. However, such a verdict is highly unlikely whatever happened.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2007
- Posts
- 522
[TW]Fox;10053760 said:
hence why i said guilty/charged. if leaving her unnatended was the cause of her death and they hid the accident wouldnt they be charged with peverting the cause of justice.
Last edited:
yes, if they can prove it, almost impossible without the body. or huge quantities of blood.
i agree entirely and i've always thought something just smelt wrong about this whole picture.
i don't particularly trust the look of either of them, they don't fit the mould of ppl who have someone missing.....it's like a look of shame/guilt or something especially on her.
they've gone way way overboard with the media exposure too, ie the pope visit etc etc ...i know they're well to do professionals but it's like they're trying to overcompensate for something else.
time will tell.......
Soldato
I noticed this in most of the clippings that were shown on the news earlier.
[TW]Fox;10053760 said:
Accidental death is frequently covered (in the UK) by manslaughter, if it can be demonstrated that the actions of someone clearly caused the death even though it was not intentional (for example, shaken children, someone who is pushed and hits their head etc).
And then there is the issue of lying, concealing the body, causing a worldwide manhunt and fraud, if indeed it was one of the parents (as I suspected all along and voiced long ago in this thread)
Soldato
I am not sure were this checking on them every 30 mins came from.
According to statements they left them asleep around 7.00-7.30pm and Mr McCann was the first to check on them at 9.00pm. Then a friend when at 9.15 (apparently saw a man carrying away a child) and then Mrs McCann at 10.00pm when she was declared missing.
The restaurant was indeed 5 minutes away as the crow flies but apparently can take up to 15 minutes because you have to walk around the outside of the complex.
Now Mr McCann is a suspect.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6983604.stm
[TW]Fox;10053760 said:
I think things are slightly different in portugal.
If they cant find the girl, or they find the girl but cant find a killer, the mcCanns will be charged with criminal negligence (or whatever the term is) for leaving the girl unattended and hence the reason why she is either dead or missing.
Which ever way people try and spin it the Mc Canns are 100% to blame for the entire affair.
Yes i am a father and no, my son has never been unatended anywhere (he is now 11)
Soldato
Or maybe they did, and its all a publicity stunt for them to get rich.
what do you think then? do you agree it's unacceptable behaviour but maybe i was going too far by suggesting they should be prosecuted. or do you just think it's a completely normal thing to do?
Soldato
She's a doctor, he's some surgon or something. She's give Madeleine some kind of sedative so she will sleep and so they can go out. Somethings gone wrong, they come back and find her OD'd
Soldato
Wow.
You are soon going to be starving your son of social development and independence. I was left alone when off school ill in the house when 10ish although never allowed to stay home overnight alone until 16 - not least because my parents don't really go anywhere overnight as they've got work pretty much every day of the week.
i don't buy that. if that's the way it happened, they did a remarkable job of covering it up in what must have been immense shock, horror and confusion when they discovered what had happened.
i don't know if they did it or not, but if they were to blame, they must have both been involved and must, as far as i can see, have had a plan in place prior to the events.
Caporegime
The blood (or DNA) in the hire car is intriguing. It suggests to me one of two things:
They waited 25 days to dispose of the body (in which case where did they hide it for so long?)
Madeleine was never killed and the whole thing a money making expedition.
Neither really adds up does it?
They waited 25 days to dispose of the body (in which case where did they hide it for so long?)
Madeleine was never killed and the whole thing a money making expedition.
Neither really adds up does it?
Permabanned
- Joined
- 13 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 5,798
I find it hard to believe they were involved. How could the Mccans possibly keep their composure been constantly followed by the media and not give anything away from nervous body language ???
There is no way they could keep that composed.
There is no way they could keep that composed.
Permabanned
They could be sociopaths, who knows maybe there never was a girl named Madeleine McCann but they'd been claiming benefits for her and this was a way to cover their tracks? 
(Bad taste > *)
(Bad taste > *)
Permabanned
- Joined
- 13 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 5,798
They could be sociopaths, who knows maybe there never was a girl named Madeleine McCann but they'd been claiming benefits for her and this was a way to cover their tracks?
(Bad taste > *)
They must be awesome with photoshop then.
Soldato
If they did do it, and its looking that way, i wonder how long till the film comes out
Is there any proof that she was seen by anyone other than Team McCann before they even went out to the restaurant for their meal? I just realised that I don't know who the last person (other than the suspected parents) to have seen her alive is, and when they saw her.