I would suggest what "Movie LotR vs Amazon LotR" shows us is that, IF you have quality writing, quality directing, quality casting & quality acting you can easily change some very large things in a story and it will STILL be successful and loved by fans. It also shows that if you have NO quality it doesn't matter what you change/don't change, your efforts will still be derided by fans no matter how much money you throw at it.
Someone a few pages back mentioned "films don't fail because their woke, they fail due to bad writing etc" (to paraphrase) and I would absolutely agree with statement but with one addition, generally we're seeing that anything considered "woke" is also virtually guaranteed to be very low quality too (writing/casting/direction etc) inevitably linking the idea of "being woke" to "being badly written, badly cast, badly acted" etc which is a massive shame because it's been proven that, if you have "quality" then you can also have a "woke" film full of progressive messaging that is really well received by everyone - fans, media, critics, Oscar winning etc - such as Hidden Figures/Green Book (racism/women's rights) or Boys Don't Cry/Priscilla Queen of the Desert/Brokeback Mountain (LGBT etc issues) or Us/Parasite (social inequity) etc.
Sadly, the abject lack of any perceivable "quality" is endemic through-out today's modern entertainment and this means that almost everything created recently that talks about really important social issues, most of which really do need highlighting to get people to change, are easily dismissed as "yet another woke piece of trash" and it's no-ones fault but those in-charge at studios etc who choose to allow this low quality work to exist despite continual failure, knowing that it repeatedly damages their "cause" overall.