Thats a good question.
There was a large portion who thought when Liverpool lost at the weekend that Alonso being gone was largely to blame.
Whats the opinions tonight about the Utd result, were Utd just poor, were Burnley just very good, was it down to Ronaldo being gone (not just his goals but his general "oh christ its ronaldo running at me effect") ?
Burnley were nothing special, and thats the worst of it.
They got about United, and when they did get forward it was mainly comical defending that let them through.
The team is lacking a leader in midfield, pace down the wings, a decent striker for Rooney to play off, a decent Keeper and a competent Center half who can play when Vidic or Rio cant.
Make no mistake, its only a fine margin that United are sat with 3 points on the table, because we were rubbish against Brum on sunday as well.
I'll elaborate, I complain when united get beat, I HATE my team getting beaten, but for the last 2 seasons we have had the best attacking player on the planet in the side, we had the two best central defenders in Europe playing side by side ahead of a great goal keeper, we had Tevez and Rooney up front Giggs and Scholes were a little bit younger and just about holding their own, even Darren Fletcher was playing well.
Every now and then when one or some of them were not fit, you got to see whats behind them, and it didnt matter, because everybody else was still hot enough to cope with it.
But now, there is no Ronaldo, no Tevez, Rio and Vidic injured, the only decent keeper at the club, injured, Scholes past it, Giggs past it, no Fletcher, no Hargreaves, Neville past it.
And the players who were behind them, are now effectively the first team squad, and they are not good enough.