Milo/UC Berkley protestors stop 'hate speech' by using violence and hate...

oulton said:
who uses 'lol' these days, how sad.
Click to expand...

Rofl!

Zatoichi.uK said:
It was a good example of an ad hominem rather than addressing the argument if nothing else.
Click to expand...

ikr - oulton's response could almost be used a a dictionary definition.

Nasher said:
Shout, insult and beat them until they agree with us!

Seems to be the "social justice warrior" mentality.
Click to expand...

It's very similar to how right wingers label those who don't agree with them as SJW's.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Evangelion said:
Sargon of Akkad puts it well:




History disagrees with you.

* Franco
* Mussolini
* Hitler
* Hideki T?j? and the Imperial Way Faction
* Engelbert Dollfuß
* Chiang Kai-shek
* Ante Paveli? and the Ustaše movement
* The Lapua Movement
* The Vichy regime
* Ioannis Metaxas
* Gyula Gömbös
* Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging
* Verbond van Actualisten

Examples could be multiplied.
Click to expand...

Hitler was a national socialist the clue is in the name
 
oulton said:
Hitler was a national socialist the clue is in the name
Click to expand...

You're showing how little you know here. National Socialism in the context of the Nazi Party does not mean Socialist or Socialism in the sense of the political definition we know, the Nazi partys use of Socialism was an attempt to redefine what Socialism was, changing it from what they saw as the traditional left-wing class struggle to a right wing movement based on nationalism and racial ideology.

This is basic GCSE history.
 
dowie said:
tis interesting to see the bias in publications like the guardian and daily fail - always worth googling a story to read multiple sources - The guardian mentions the charges not being pursued but doesn't allude to the reason, googling it reveals that the shooter was attacked by protestors and initially tried to get away from the guy he ended up shooting

not that that would be acceptable by UK standards but in the US it seems to be legitimate self defence thus no charges
Click to expand...

police recovered pipes, poles, wooden planks, hammers and flares used in attacks just like this. so peaceful.
 
platypus said:
You're showing how little you know here. National Socialism in the context of the Nazi Party does not mean Socialist or Socialism in the sense of the political definition we know, the Nazi partys use of Socialism was an attempt to redefine what Socialism was, changing it from what they saw as the traditional left-wing class struggle to a right wing movement based on nationalism and racial ideology.

This is basic GCSE history.
Click to expand...
Absolute rubbish. That you believe gcse history says it all...
 
oulton said:
Absolute rubbish. That you believe gcse history says it all...
Click to expand...

I don't "believe" GCSE history, that was an indication of the level of simple knowledge you would require to know this basic thing.

Lets see your reasoning for Hitler having been a left-wing socialist. If the only thing you have to go on is his party used the word Socialist, then there isn't really much point trying to engage you is there?
 
You know what I do when I see this stuff? I go for a walk, go play a game, book aholiday, whatever. This stuff only affects those who choose to let it affect them. There'sso much anger, frustration and now violence and people choose it.

Let them crack on I say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom