Milo/UC Berkley protestors stop 'hate speech' by using violence and hate...

They are however forcing disparate peoples to be Chinese, or face being shut off from the world.

And if you dare tell them that Tibetans/Taiwanese/Hong Kong aren't Chinese, they go mental.

That's called expansionism, not fascism. Two entirely different things. Also they don't go "mental", just pig headed about it.

Seriously, the word Nazi needs to be banned in SC like ********* is
 
No, they are not rounding up everyone who's not Chinese and putting them into camps. Full on Nazi state today is North Korea

I was referring more to the interesting combination of a single party state but where private industry has a pretty free reign.

As with 1930's Germany, it is a combination that allows and encourages extremely rapid development.
 
You're showing how little you know here. National Socialism in the context of the Nazi Party does not mean Socialist or Socialism in the sense of the political definition we know, the Nazi partys use of Socialism was an attempt to redefine what Socialism was, changing it from what they saw as the traditional left-wing class struggle to a right wing movement based on nationalism and racial ideology.

This is basic GCSE history.

Ooo. This is a subject I'm interested in :). Just a few ramblings on my part. Feel free to ignore them :).

Hitler certainly believed in social system which helped the poor and gave to the community and in that respect he believed in wealth redistribution which is a core tenant of socialism. The difference is that while socialism and communism aim to destroy nationalism and the nation and instead form one global communist state with the proletariat in charge Hitler was much more focused on Germany and the German people over what happened to other peoples. It was always Germany first (who else has been talking about their nation first recently? *cough* Trump *cough*) and other nations second. Which is why we always talk about national socialism because it was a strange blend of socialism, nationalism, racism and racial superiority that was what set the nazis apart from other socialist countries.

Here, let me give you an example of a Hitler speech:

"A new community is being built in Germany and it is our most beautiful goal and aim. Those who can't even see past their own nose deserves our pity more than anything else. It is the luck to help, which rewards those who commits themselves to this socialist state and this commitment must happen every new winter. Our social welfare system is so much more than just charity. Because we do not say to the rich people: Please, give something to the poor. Instead we say: German people, help yourself! Everyone must help, whether you are rich or poor! Everyone must have the belief that there's always someone in a much worse situation that I am, and this person I want to help as a comrade.

If one should say: Yes, but do I have to sacrifice a lot? That is the glory of giving! When you sacrifice for your community, then you can walk with your head held up high. Our belief in Germany is unshakeable! And our will is overwhelming! And when will and belief combine so ardently that not even the heavens will deny you. And I expect of every German with a sense of character and decency to march with us on our columns!"

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnpTWKKWQ1o

Reading that speech it doesn't sound so unreasonable does it?
 
I needn't remind that Hitlers goal with Poland (beyond mitteleuropa etc etc) was to move onto Russia to eradicate Communism that was non-ironically funded by the Kaiser to destabilise the first Democracy that Russia had. (Its difficult to really grasp nowadays, what with the entirely ironic US propaganda machine after the war)

Sure Poland was in need of defence, but i'm not sure it was really worth the war that ensued. Should have just let Stalin and Hitler go full pelt while we built up further, but that is a "What-if" reality and is utterly pointless to argue now.
 
Last edited:
No, they are not rounding up everyone who's not Chinese and putting them into camps. Full on Nazi state today is North Korea

The nazis never rounded up everyone who wasnt german and put them into camps either.


Only country that rounded people up purely by nationality was the USA with the japanese
 
I needn't remind that Hitlers goal with Poland (beyond mitteleuropa etc etc) was to move onto Russia to eradicate Communism that was non-ironically funded by the Kaiser to destabilise the first Democracy that Russia had. (Its difficult to really grasp nowadays, what with the entirely ironic US propaganda machine after the war)

Sure Poland was in need of defence, but i'm not sure it was really worth the war that ensued. Should have just let Stalin and Hitler go full pelt while we built up further, but that is a "What-if" reality and is utterly pointless to argue now.

You should read this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable

Basically a plan by the British government to ally with the Germans in 1945 and invade the USSR to destroy communism. Interesting read.
 
Back on topic but one of the UC Berkley rioters has been identified, and actually works for the university!: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ative-bragged-online-university-staff-member/ (warning: some swearing in embedded tweets). Looks like a nice chap...

Been identified by a person on the net...not terribly convincing.

It's plausible, since the university is a promoter of authoritarian intolerance, but that's not a reasonable degree of proof.

Not that it matters, since even if he is guilty he'll probably get away with it. Fashionable prejudice is usually tolerated and when it's very fashionable its followers can get away with violence and intimidation.
 
1bbra7nkppdy.jpg


5veh7iegvpdy.jpg
 
Last edited:
milio wants to commit genocide now does he?


5veh7iegvpdy.jpg


Although how often do we hear what that woman is saying but with the word Muslim instead of nazi when anything is done against Islamic terror attacks?
 
It's obviously the protestors who are Hitler in that cartoon, since they're the violent power-crazed authoritarian bigots.

Is Milo Captain America in that cartoon?

He's a libertarian (and far more liberal than the "liberals"), so he supports freedom of speech and would allow the violent authoritarian bigots who've usurped and corrupted liberalism to speak. It's them who are using violence to prevent him speaking.

But it doesn't seem like a good fit.

Ah, no, I've got it!

Milo is the child in that cartoon. Captain America is the university authorities, who support the violence and intimidation.
 
That link supports Tefal's statement (not that I know for sure it is correct, but the link just posted doesn't contradict it)
 
Back
Top Bottom