Soldato
Now that is how it's done - both in how they implement it, and how the presenter should describe it to the audience. Great explanation.
That is a great explanation and demonstration of the track limits. I do feel Sky/F1 need to up their game.A short clip from the Supercars coverage at the weekend with Larko explaining how they monitor track limit infringements in the series. Maybe F1 could use a little help from down under?
(Sticking this in here for more eyes on it plus I've mostly abandoned the Supercars thread due to poor health.)
If anything it’s the FIA’s systems that police the track limits and they’re sorely lacking and seem to rely on a manual process, but I’m likely mistaken.That is a great explanation and demonstration of the track limits. I do feel Sky/F1 need to up their game.
How many is that now, I can think of three. Moving in the braking zone, being alongside during a rolling restart and this. Any others?Considering Max was guilty of this twice in the last two (?) races, shall we call this another Verstappen rule?
In other news, stopping in the pit lane (or rather holding up people) is now banned. https://www.planetf1.com/news/fia-ban-pit-lane-impeding-brazilian-gp
Considering Max was guilty of this twice in the last two (?) races, shall we call this another Verstappen rule?
Indeed.How many is that now, I can think of three. Moving in the braking zone, being alongside during a rolling restart and this. Any others?
I think he was the only one in Singapore. https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/...-pit-lane-exit-in-q1.1777216237586030688.htmlHe wasn't the only one though, was he?
No because there was no rule then that could result in any other penalty aside from a reprimand.In other news, stopping in the pit lane (or rather holding up people) is now banned. https://www.planetf1.com/news/fia-ban-pit-lane-impeding-brazilian-gp
Considering Max was guilty of this twice in the last two (?) races, shall we call this another Verstappen rule?
You're talking to a wall - he only has eyes for one manNo because there was no rule then that could result in any other penalty aside from a reprimand.
Max hasn't been the only driver to do this anyway..
To your first point, impeding always has the potential to be punished with a penalty. This is what the stewards said about Singapore;No because there was no rule then that could result in any other penalty aside from a reprimand.
Max hasn't been the only driver to do this anyway..
That was why there was so much hoo-ha about it. Turns out the stewards can call a "reprimand" a penalty when they feel like it...Whilst no obvious advantage was gained by the driver in waiting at the Pit Exit for what is deemed to be an extraordinary long time, the potential for this to negatively impact other drivers warrants a penalty. Whilst it is noted that the car behind could have overtaken car 1, it is preferable that cars depart the pit exit in an orderly manner.
That's the positive way of thinking about it. Others might see you're exploiting loopholes that shouldn't be there; that it's disingenuous, unsportsmanlike and shows a lack of respect for the FIA and your competitors. But hey, that's just my opinion of RB as a wholeIf rules are being created because of your actions, that just means you're pushing the boundaries better than any other team.
Not really a rule as such, but he was the reason a lot of sausage kerbs got added to certain corners before track limits monitoring really became a thing - remember 'Verstoppens'?How many is that now, I can think of three. Moving in the braking zone, being alongside during a rolling restart and this. Any others?
You're either first or you're last - it's a sport, not a daycare.That's the positive way of thinking about it. Others might see you're exploiting loopholes that shouldn't be there; that it's disingenuous, unsportsmanlike and shows a lack of respect for the FIA and your competitors. But hey, that's just my opinion of RB as a whole