Soldato
of course. everyone's clutching at straws (inc me) because there is actually very little evidence availableThink some of you are focusing too much on the messages. This could easily be about something else that happened.
of course. everyone's clutching at straws (inc me) because there is actually very little evidence availableThink some of you are focusing too much on the messages. This could easily be about something else that happened.
The BBC has quoted Red Bull in that the individual has been suspended because they were dishonest.
"The company cannot comment on this internal matter," a Red Bull spokesperson said on Thursday.
BBC Sport has learned the reason given by Red Bull to the employee was that she had been dishonest.
Agreed. She might have taken a notepad or pen home or something. Taken one more team polo shirt than she was issued.Think some of you are focusing too much on the messages. This could easily be about something else that happened.
We now live in a world where the CEO of your company can send you a text message admitting he rubbed one out over you and YOU are the one suspended while he gets away scot-free. Wild.
of course. everyone's clutching at straws (inc me) because there is actually very little evidence available
Agreed. She might have taken a notepad or pen home or something. Taken one more team polo shirt than she was issued.
Clearly when the CEO, not your boss, or even your bosses boss, is making advances, unwanted or not, when they’re married, can you not see the clearly wrong power dynamic at play here? Even if she did something wrong it doesn’t absolve Horner of making many mistakes that would likely, at just about any other business or workplace, see him out on his ear, and very quickly indeed.If Red Bull have found that she has done something worthy of being suspended then why shouldn't they? From the messages we've seen she's been just as complicit in this 'hanky panky'. Why are you only chastising Horner and not the female colleague also involved?
Red Bull have clearly taken this all very seriously, they wouldn't suspend one of the individuals involved without very good reason.
What do you know that we don't?
Clearly when the CEO, not your boss, or even your bosses boss, is making advances, unwanted or not, when they’re married, can you not see the clearly wrong power dynamic at play here? Even if she did something wrong it doesn’t absolve Horner of making many mistakes that would likely, at just about any other business or workplace, see him out on his ear, and very quickly indeed.
Probably took home some of that expensive catering they lay on there.Agreed. She might have taken a notepad or pen home or something. Taken one more team polo shirt than she was issued.
Amazing how some people on here still don't understand the power dynamics happening when a company's CEO gets himself involved with a colleague at a much more junior level. I mean honestly, educate yourselves guys. It's not 2016 anymoreFrom the messages we've seen she's been just as complicit in this 'hanky panky'. Why are you only chastising Horner and not the female colleague also involved?
The usual expected reply from you. Can no-one answer why Red Bull can't suspend someone if they have found wrongdoing? Just turning around and saying, but but look at Christian and what he's been up to is completely irrelevant to the news story today about what the female has been suspended for. All we know so far is that it is in relation to being dishonest. All of this is independant on whatever your views of Christian are and what you think he has done. May I remind people that an independent investigation found Horner cleared of inappropriate behaviour.Amazing how some people on here still don't understand the power dynamics happening when a company's CEO gets himself involved with a colleague at a much more junior level. I mean honestly, educate yourselves guys. It's not 2016 anymore![]()
Quite and very well put....The usual expected reply from you. Can no-one answer why Red Bull can't suspend someone if they have found wrongdoing? Just turning around and saying, but but look at Christian and what he's been up to is completely irrelevant to the news story today about what the female has been suspended for. All we know so far is that it is in relation to being dishonest. All of this is independant on whatever your views of Christian are and what you think he has done. May I remind people that an independent investigation found Horner cleared of inappropriate behaviour.
None of this outrage aimed at Horner should have a direct impact on today's decision to suspend her. Clearly Red Bull have very good grounds to do so, yet the only response is.. but but Horner did stuff too.
Clearly when the CEO, not your boss, or even your bosses boss, is making advances, unwanted or not, when they’re married, can you not see the clearly wrong power dynamic at play here? Even if she did something wrong it doesn’t absolve Horner of making many mistakes that would likely, at just about any other business or workplace, see him out on his ear, and very quickly indeed.
The usual expected reply from you. Can no-one answer why Red Bull can't suspend someone if they have found wrongdoing?
No matter the rights or wrongs, the legality, whatever...that's a really crappy look for RB.
I mean if you worked the case and can legally provide us with details of said case, I'm all ears.
Because a liar got fired?
Isn't that what they are doing by suspending her?They need to sort out their dirty laundry and move on. These sort of theatrics and drama have really pushed me away from F1 over the last few years.