Still amazes me how quick people are to affilliate other terrorist activities at the mere mention of the word "Allah hu Akbar" - yet refuse to believe it when the words "Britain First" are provided by multiple eye witnesses.
Anyways - for those who still think Mr Muir had nothing to do with Britain First - here you go - Photo has Dewsbury Town Hall in the background - would you look at that, guess who that is stood in the middle?
![]()
Lemme guess - he was just passing and got caught in the moment arazi?
Maybe now might be a good time to come up with some phrases to describe the deniers
BF apologise-rs?
BF sympathisers?
But hey - I'm not gunna stoop to the levels of the known bigots here, jesting aside.
"It should be said that we still don’t know for sure all the details of the attack"
Just because you think it doesn't make it reality
Well, it couldn't be me. And I would assume as the affiliate members of Britain First isn't that large, there aren't that many candidates...
I'm not saying it is, but don't you see your own bias? When you immediately call it a photo shop, then when it's shown to be on a legitimate website you come up with another flippant dismissal, can't you even acknowledge the possibility for discussion that this was a politically right wing motivated attack, just as abhorrent as a religiously motivated one? (Which you are happy to endlessly espouse about)
I'm just thinking about the guy that has done this. From the photo issued in the press, the one of him sitting on the bench, I would say that he 'doesn't look quite right' and that was the first thing that struck me when I saw him, by that I mean I think he may have a mental health issue. He's a long term volunteer so that puts him on benefits, most likely ESA or similar. He appears to be fully active and physically fit therefore it's quite possible that his need for benefits points to the fact that he does indeed have some kind of mental health issue. Now mix this with being brainwashed (easily led too perhaps) and we have the ingredients for something like this.
I am speculating of course, but I think it's a reasonable speculation (if there's such a thing) and what this gives us is more of what myself/Freakbro touched on (we didn't actually touch, honest!) earlier and makes it all very complicated with all sorts of possible theories, claims, defences, allegations, pleas, outcomes etc.
Haha, I'm so glad other people are starting to pick up on his utter hypocrisy. I managed to suss out his agenda many many months ago and his cognition remains unchanged to this very minute.
All areas have been hit but personal support especially in ones own home has been hammered. He may have been admitted at some point into a support unit and cuts may have seen him, as a low risk, be released.
We just don't know at the moment, it really could be anything.
There is more to this story. More will come out soon.
The shooter has mental health issues and is easily led. Particularity easily led by his brother. How "he" got hold of a gun will be key
All is not as it seems right now
A terrorist is not simply someone who creates fear amongst the public. If that were the case every single news outlet would technically be a terrorist organisation.
If this man killed her for political reasons, then he killed her because he believed the act would cast fear and terror within politics, and is therefore a terrorist. A terrorist doesn't have to have something against the public for him to be a terrorist, where did you get that idea? No, his aim is not to cast terror to the public, it's to cast terror to politicians, IF of course it was politically motivated and not just a random slaughtering.
In fact the definition of terrorist is "a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.". It's got nothing to do with casting fear amongst the general public, that's the job of news outlets.
In fact you say "More and more this looks like an individual that was specifically targeted." but you conveniently forget the fact that this "specific" woman was a politician? Cognitive dissonance?
The only thing we on the ahem "Right" are trying to disassociate ourselves with is the EU. The remain open borders, socialist 'left ' crowd in here have made their position clear that anyone voting leave is an uneducated, racist, xenophobic, fascist. So if you want to associate us with this murdering P.O.S. You go ahead. I'll take the ROP defense. I'm a moderate, nothing to do with me guvnor.
I'm bored of humanity these days to be quite frank...
When will the day come people cease being retarded and doing **** like this?
Lmao your sig.
Actually, I do wonder exactly that. But not in the context of mental health issues.
How many more people in these groups are of a similar mindset just not taking that final step to 'take their country back'?
How much influence the recent referendum campaigning has played in pushing him to do this?
I'll have you guys know, I have an internet IQ score of 170.
Plebs.
Out of context post is out of context.
No place for it in this thread.
Having mental health issues != Insane
After the Scottish vote there were riots so I won't be surprised.
Seems laughable now doesn't it, maybe in ten years might not be so.