Frankly after 2 people have pointed out your duplicity on this thread you're as shameless as n11k posting here.
You mean wrongly pointed out, they and you have that opinion all because I start this thread and the Orlando one.
Silly children.
Frankly after 2 people have pointed out your duplicity on this thread you're as shameless as n11k posting here.
Have you got stats on that?
It is not my opinion that a terrorist is defined as: "a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims."
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=define:+terrorist
If you think dictionary definitions are "my" opinion then you have simply again proved you are suffering from cognitive issues because you are suggesting that results from Google are somehow fed by my opinion, which is completely and utterly illogical.
Mr Jack posted a number of media outlets reporting multiple witnesses earlier in the thread are they all unreliable?
Because she happened to be his planned target. Do you really think this guy thinks there's no other "traitors" out there??? So, in that case why did he yell "Death to traitors" as a plural???
It's been confirmed anyway. He killed Jo because he thought she was a traitor to the country, as literally stated in court. She was not a traitor to HIM personally lmao, and that's why hes a terrorist.
MattyG also said his...friend...knew him well and that there was more to it that would come out soon enough.
And there you go. Can you now see the possibility that this guy is peeved as a result of his mental health care being cut and she was too busy helping people half way around the world, abandoning her constituents. Wouldn't you agree that that could be seen as a cause to dislike someone?
So we have multiple possible causes which has been my point all along.
You're being slightly disingenuous with some parts.
Definite cuts which impact treatment. We know these cuts happened. It's widely accepted that the state of mental health care in this country is a disgrace. That gives 4 of your points motives of a personal grievance against her. Now given what Mattyg and links to the reddit thread have shown we have a guy who is mentally ill, is easily led, has a brother with links and involvements in far right groups.
Can you see now how we have someone being lead/pushed down a path that they do not fully understand?
So are you saying when a typical terrorist you find in the media, blows up a dozen innocent people along with himself because he understands he will wake up in heaven with several dozen virgins at his disposal, is actually right in his understanding that he will wake up in heaven with several dozen virgins at his disposal? Double standards ahoy!
Are you suggesting something specific is wrong that I have stated, do tell.
From the guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...as-mair-told-police-he-was-political-activist
"Mair is alleged to have said “Britain first”, “this is for Britain”, “Britain always comes first” and “keep Britain independent” as he attacked the MP, prosecutors said."
If the prosecutors are saying this, then I guess they are fairly confident he said something.
I'd imagine the police will be interviewing them as it is a priority line of enquiry. Though unsurprisingly I don't have inside knowledge of the witnesses at the scene, just what has been reported. Are you still doubting right wing connections at this point?
Mentally ill guy with very right wing views imo.
What makes you suggest I have "forgotten" the potential for mental health issues?
Either
a) You now accept it is a politically motivated attack and your earlier response to me was in error.
b) You continue to suggest it is not a politically motivated attack.
c) NVM Im running to my saaaaafe spaaaace
Quite possibly, would that negate any political agenda?
what was this about?