I'm going to go against the trend here but its still incredible value for money.
I can only think the people complaining aren't old enough to remember having to go to a video store, pay what would be in todays money about £5-6 for a film for one night.
You would then need to drop it back the next day.
RPI peaked north of 11%. Arent those contracts RPI + a percentage?Indeed..and as i put it in my earlier post, it is the scale of the rises.
Its like Broadband. NOWTV decided to put mine up 13% last year. Was inflation 13% in the year running up to that? The **** it was. They are all just taking the **** to pad corporate/shareholder profits and stupid executive/CEO salaries.
Doesn't sky have ads and people have paid for that for years before netflix.
Giving Apple tv a shot.
I don't get why the scale of the increase is relevant either.
I mean your a consumer with the ability to choose what you spend your money on, or not.
Don't think its value for money, cancel, think its still value for money, carry on.
To be brutally honest it was clearly only so cheap historically to ensure they killed off as much competition as possible.
If Netflix had been £30 a month from the start I bet the likes of Blockbuster would have survived a hell of a lot longer.
We canceled with them the other day, been on Netflix since 2017. Giving Apple tv a shot.
Agreed.
Squid Game season 2 had a very disappointing ending — no spoilers, but it felt more like a mid-season cliffhanger rather than the actual end to the season. I'm not sure if it was caught in the writers' strike or if it was a commercial decision to stretch what should have been one season into two, but it's frustrating having to wait until the summer for a resolution.
We enjoyed Wednesday (we only just finished it, so we're a bit late to the party), and Griselda was great, but there definitely doesn't seem to be the depth, quantity and quality of Netflix from a few years ago.
I will also be doing the "that show looks good, let's subscribe for a month".
I'm sure this will stop at some point and you'll have to take out a contract for a year or something.
Wonder if this is the charging limit being hit. Or if the majority will keep on paying.
Sky is going up 6.2% and due to a loophole they're exploiting you can't use it to quit mid contract eitherBut that different as I only pay about £80 per month for sky![]()
I hope not, but then when you see the likes of Now TV having the option of minimum term packages at a cheaper monthly price, it sure is a possibility, in fact I wouldn't mind that same approach if the subscriber still had the option of a monthly sub at standard price or a minimum term at a discounted price.
I seem to remember a Blockbuster VHS rental being £6.95 ish probably mid to late 90s. Around £12 in today's money. Makes sub services seem kind of reasonable.
Oh yeah I get it. From a consumer perspective it's just the same end result. Plus you don't have to rewind it and drive it back again.Physical product, commercial property rents, staff costs, utility costs, distribution, etc etc etc.
It just doesn't make sense that streaming costs as much as it does.
I would like new tier based on how much you use the service - say, a cheaper tier for up to 40 hours of content per month, then up to 100, then an unlimited. Thing is, that helps the consumer, not the business.