Yes, expectation does not align with hope in this case. I fully expect it will be released with seemingly no change to the specifications and no confirmation of what exactly was changed.
New Dell 30" 4k Oled Announced CES 2016
- Thread starter RareEntitee
- Start date
Yes, expectation does not align with hope in this case. I fully expect it will be released with seemingly no change to the specifications and no confirmation of what exactly was changed.
Yes, expectation does not align with hope in this case. I fully expect it will be released with seemingly no change to the specifications and no confirmation of what exactly was changed.
I'm not sure it gets released at all. Pretty unlikely it goes on sale before mid Q3 at the earliest, now ... its window is rapidly closing.
Was thinking about this just now, googled for more news and apparently it's just been released!
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/52937/dell-surprises-new-30-inch-4k-120hz-oled-display/index.html
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/52937/dell-surprises-new-30-inch-4k-120hz-oled-display/index.html
Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 6,038
- Location
- North Leicestershire
all great until the image retention sets in from static desktop items
It's not been released yet. Not even on Dell.com yet
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Feb 2007
- Posts
- 14,932
- Location
- Area 18, ArcCorp
Seems like Tweaktown have essentially re-released the news item. As to why? I'm gonna guess for views
It was previously touted as 60Hz now it's 120Hz
I'm keeping hold of my 27" 4K IPS from Dell until we can get a 27-32" 4K IPS 144Hz G-Sync display.
Associate
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2014
- Posts
- 1,070
Would like to at least have the option to VESA mount this thing at that price. Doesn't look like that option is available from the pictures of the back of the screen.
Associate
- Joined
- 16 Apr 2012
- Posts
- 161
- Location
- United Kingdom
Still very interested in this monitor and am putting off my monitor purchase until it makes a solid appearance; however want to wait for reviews and further feedback from various sources such as tftcentral who I hope will get to put it through it's paces for an informed decision.
Biggest concern is the inherent potential of image burn; however if DELL have used some wizardry to stop it (and said reliable reviews are able to validate it - not people denouncing something they don't own and have zero advance product insight of) then can see it becoming my monitor for life coupled with the right graphics cards (looking at you 1080ti / Titan P).
I love IPS but the compromises (BLB, overclocked panels lottery etc) are starting to outweigh me sinking £1k on a monitor that is almost perfect. That said the same applies to this; if it releases and it's garbage, then I'll simply pass.
Biggest concern is the inherent potential of image burn; however if DELL have used some wizardry to stop it (and said reliable reviews are able to validate it - not people denouncing something they don't own and have zero advance product insight of) then can see it becoming my monitor for life coupled with the right graphics cards (looking at you 1080ti / Titan P).
I love IPS but the compromises (BLB, overclocked panels lottery etc) are starting to outweigh me sinking £1k on a monitor that is almost perfect. That said the same applies to this; if it releases and it's garbage, then I'll simply pass.
I didn't think a miniDP 1.2 port had enough bandwidth to do 120hz at 4K ?
120Hz has been nothing more than a rumour since it was first announced. It's possible it might be but that was never mentioned in the actual Dell press releases at the time
The only way i'd ever upgrade my 21:9 Samsung is with a 21:9 Oled but I'm curious what the image retention and burning would be like with an Oled on static items..
Owning the E6 Oled it does get quite abit of retention especially after gaming so I do wonder how they would handle constant desktop items stuck on the screen for ages with this.
Owning the E6 Oled it does get quite abit of retention especially after gaming so I do wonder how they would handle constant desktop items stuck on the screen for ages with this.
It was previously touted as 60Hz now it's 120Hz
I'm keeping hold of my 27" 4K IPS from Dell until we can get a 27-32" 4K IPS 144Hz G-Sync display.
144Hz is not needed, plus at 4k res thats stupidly hard to drive for absolutely zero difference. 100Hz to 144Hz is placebo, plain and simple.
34" 100Hz superwide OLED... now that would be something else.
I bet it would also have a super wide price tag .....
I agree that running 4K at high refresh rates is currently a massive challenge for any system. Although I'm sure in time that will change. But I don't agree that anything over 100Hz is just placebo. There's a noticeable difference in image fluidity and speed, not to mention additional benefits in perceived motion blur as refresh rate improves. Higher refresh rates also make technologies like 3D vision and blur reduction backlights possible, when they aren't available at as low as 100hz. So again there's a benefit in supporting 144hz or above