New Orleans incident

Efour said:
Bong night?
Click to expand...
so its not terrorism still? the guy literally pledged allegiance to ISIS in videos, they will tell us he was just a mentally confused individual next, anything to say its not a terror attack.

Shamsud-Din Bahar Jabbar pledged 'allegiance to ISIS' in a series of videos he shared to his social media before killing 15 people.
According to The New York Times, he 'pledged allegiance to ISIS' in the videos.
Click to expand...


We used to call these terrorists lone wolf
a terrorist or other criminal who acts alone rather than as part of a larger organization.
Click to expand...

Guess dictionary definitions don't count, only what politicians tell you.
They could claim the sky is green and people would argue on their behalf that it is. because the law says it
 
Last edited:
arknor said:
so its not terrorism still? the guy literally pledged allegiance to ISIS in videos, they will tell us he was just a mentally confused individual next, anything to say its not a terror attack.




We used to call these terrorists lone wolf


Guess dictionary definitions don't count, only what politicians tell you.
They could claim the sky is green and people would argue on their behalf that it is. because the law says it
Click to expand...
dude i dunno who or what you are arguing for this is clearly a case of islamic terrorism and they are investigating links to a wider network. Again i dunno what media you read but everything ive seen has said the alike.
 
Abraxaz1 said:
Texas born and raised, ex us army veteran and Muslim.

Gonna be interesting to see how trump twists this to anti migrant rhetoric
Click to expand...

Manchester born Salman Abedi killed 22 and injured 1017.

Second, third etc generation migrants launching these sort of terroist attacks isn't an endorsement of the current western immigration policies, that pay little to no attention to the ideologies immigrants bring with them and spread to others, but rather a repudiation of such policies.
 
Last edited:
Grim5 said:
A sign of things to come for the Trump-Musk presidency
Click to expand...

Has the attack been linked to Trump/musk?

It looks like the cybertruck saved lives by containing/directing the blast of the ied.

Hopefully car manufacturers can design a safety measure that would force the car to break if the driver tried to accelerate into crowds
 
mburn_83 said:
Has the attack been linked to Trump/musk?

It looks like the cybertruck saved lives by containing/directing the blast of the ied.

Hopefully car manufacturers can design a safety measure that would force the car to break if the driver tried to accelerate into crowds
Click to expand...


Not much of an ied, just some firecrackers and a battery fire
 
Last edited:
Wasn't it an improvised explosive device?

Isn't that literally what one of those is? Something that blows up that isn't a conventional bomb?
 
And some want to invite IS fighters and their spouses back to the UK. I think that another outbreak of this virulence is imminent.
 
VincentHanna said:
Source?
Click to expand...

Source that IS is a virulence? Goes without saying.

As to some people wanting them back, enough legal effort has been extended on one particular person trying to establish the precedent that this person cannot be declared non grata by the home secretary.
 
Last edited:
Freakbro said:
Yea, because I always think of the cars capability to contain an IED explosion when looking to buy....

Anyway, does the driver win the worst suicide bomber award so early in the year? :cry:
Click to expand...

Hmmm...he injured some peeps so maybe not quite. Be interesting to know if they intended to commit suicide or just failed with a bombing.
 
Hagar said:
Source that IS is a virulence? Goes without saying.

As to some people wanting them back, enough legal effort has been extended on one particular person trying to establish the precedent that this person cannot be declared non grata by the home secretary.
Click to expand...
1) I think you're using virulence incorrectly
2) Specifically what has this got to do with what happened in New Orleans?
 
matt100 said:
1) I think you're using virulence incorrectly
2) Specifically what has this got to do with what happened in New Orleans?
Click to expand...

1) using virulence metaphorically for behaviour that spreads by infection and is sick beyond belief.

2) specifically not much except see 1) above.
 
Ok I'm still pretty confident it doesn't mean that.. something I believe could have low virulence.

Also your view is ironic given you're contradicting your own signature.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom