Yes, several times. ~35 ship battles, several times. They are in there, have been since launch.
Cool, what happened, did ships get destroyed, or were they just shooting at each other until you left?
Yes, several times. ~35 ship battles, several times. They are in there, have been since launch.
Yes, several times. ~35 ship battles, several times. They are in there, have been since launch.
Assumption is the mother of all **** ups.
Cool, what happened, did ships get destroyed, or were they just shooting at each other until you left?
The ASA ruling is in: Hello Games did not mislead gamers.
Hilariously, only 23 complaints filed...
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2...mans-sky-steam-page-did-not-mislead-consumers
The full ASA ruling report here:
https://www.asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudications/2016/11/Valve-Corporation/SHP_ADJ_351045.aspx
Can we put this to bed now and get back to discussing the actual bloody game?
What a hot, steaming, gargantuan pile of horse ****.
There you go game devs, advertise whatever you want, feed us ****, punters will buy your **** and no authority will do anything about it.
The videogame industry is one messed up place indeed.
What a hot, steaming, gargantuan pile of horse ****.
There you go game devs, advertise whatever you want, feed us ****, punters will buy your **** and no authority will do anything about it.
The videogame industry is one messed up place indeed.
Is it still crap? I bought it on release and refunded it
The videogame industry is one messed up place indeed.
To be honest I found it quite fun but then again it seems like my type of game, hopefully the first patch is a sign of good things to develop for this game
The consumer is far more messed up than the industry.
It's now a lifestyle rather than a hobby to some folk and they'll buy anything that promises to fill a niche that the previous 10 games of the same nature didn't fill for them and we the consumer continue to pre-order games for fun.
Don't blame the industry for simply supplying what the consumer is lapping up.
I feel they only got cleared due to a bad case brought by the claimants. No offence, but you should never expect to win if you just say " durr this game lied and let the other side defend the one solitary issue".
Reading the letter makes it seem like HG just threw "procedural generation" at ASA (seemingly filled with morons) and that was that.
To be honest I found it quite fun but then again it seems like my type of game, hopefully the first patch is a sign of good things to develop for this game