Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,484
The forbidden article is actually pretty interesting, definitely makes you question whether she did it
Nurse arrested for murdering babies
- Thread starter neocon
- Start date
The forbidden article is actually pretty interesting, definitely makes you question whether she did it
Apart from the censorship issue, isn't it about time the British justice system moved out of the Dickens era and realised we're flooded with information.
Why should foreign people know more about a British case than a British citizen!? The law is an embarrassment and belittles us all.
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 1,446
I followed all of the trial evidence released to the media and I'm 99.99999% sure she did it. But if you have a link to the article I'll read it on Tor Browser if you can post it.
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 1,446
The idea is that the jurors are not off put by misrepresentations in the media. In the US they order jurors not to watch the media depicting the case instead.
In the UK there is also the issue that the defence can move to a mistrial because of media representations affecting the case.
Soldato
I would also question why people need to know all the details. The phrase "trial by media" is already true, without making it worse.
Associate
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 1,446
There was evidence of the babies having injections of air, doctor testimony about the cause of death, handwritten notes admitting she did it, her standing over a baby she suffocated, she was there for all 25 of the babies who suffered. But yes, as you were chief. Let's doubt the verdict of a jury of our peers who saw all the evidence, which I'm not doing justice too off the top of my head.
FTFY.
Soldato
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 4,314
Well that's me convinced.
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 4,314
I know it's bad but if you want to make an argument then lay it out here instead of pointing to some external source. I'm open to being persuaded. Let's see it.
Last edited:
Soldato
At least they have pointed at something...
Trying to blame "the system" or use "the system is broken / NHS is broken " as an excuse for someone who admitted of her own free will what she did, is just ridiculous.
So to be clear, the insulin that was found in 2 of the IV bags just "magically" appeared in there? Was that the "dysfunctional system" that put it in there?
To be fair an admission is technically not an assured measure of guilt though with everything else going on I can't imagine the probability of it being some massive conspiracy being anything other than imperceptible.
Soldato
there was a lot of negligence of display by the NHS during Lucy Letby’s tenure as a nurse, but the vast majority of that was not taking action around managing complaints of her behaviour acceptably.
I remember from the case doctors being made to apologise to her after making complaints about her, and moving her around to lessen the impact. But to suggest she’s somehow the fall girl for a NHS malpractice issue is ridiculous. She was found by a jury guilty of having acted with malice in the murder of numerous babies.
I remember from the case doctors being made to apologise to her after making complaints about her, and moving her around to lessen the impact. But to suggest she’s somehow the fall girl for a NHS malpractice issue is ridiculous. She was found by a jury guilty of having acted with malice in the murder of numerous babies.
Soldato
But what has that got to do with a murderous nurse on a killing spree?
Your still missing the point of the question you were asked before.... We all know how much of a mess the NHS is at times, but it's also there at any point for you to walk in and be treated..... for free.
@Zatoichi.uK asked you - "I know it's bad but if you want to make an argument then lay it out here instead of pointing to some external source. I'm open to being persuaded. Let's see it."
Keep repeating that the NHS is bad isn't an answer/or evidence to contradict the "guilty" verdict.....
Just sounds like you have your own agenda and just refuse to be objective about the evidence.... your just cherry picking bits and bobs and throwing out vague comments and conspiracy theories. talking in circles and answering questions with questions....
see my point above - just another classic poster who goes round in circles, without actually answering the questions asked, or providing any evidence to back up their "claims"
I know it's working as intended. I'm advocating changing it.
I don't see why we can't have the US version here.
We're being treated like children, too immature to handle different opinions.
Caporegime
Show me on the doll where the NHS touched you.
The change has had no shortage of advocacy for decades now sadly, you have a higher chance of winning every lottery on the face of the earth on the same day.
Which is why I vehemently support Guy Fawkes 2.0.