• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA 4000 Series

Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
12,019
Location
Uk
Of course. That doesn't stop me from feeling it's stupid to complain about the lesser of 2 evils.

I walk down the street and I see someone stealing peoples wallets and someone else shooting people with an ak47. I would be a tiny bit more bothered by the shooting guy.
I think the more appropriate analogy would be one guy stole 5 wallets and another guy stole 6, is the guy that stole 5 any less of a criminal?
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
19 Jan 2022
Posts
2,753
Location
Devilarium
I think the more appropriate analogy would be one guy stole 5 wallets and another guy stole 6, is the guy that stole 5 any less of a criminal?
I have to assume he will get a lesser sentence, yeah. In this forum one guy gets a slap in the wrist and the other one jail time

It's not like I disagree with what you are saying, but we have to admit this forum is very invested in hating nvidia and intel.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
12,019
Location
Uk
I have to assume he will get a lesser sentence, yeah. In this forum one guy gets a slap in the wrist and the other one jail time

It's not like I disagree with what you are saying, but we have to admit this forum is very invested in hating nvidia and intel.
I think most people don't like any of them at the minute because they are all scamming consumers.
 
Associate
Joined
22 Nov 2020
Posts
1,472
I think most people don't like any of them at the minute because they are all scamming consumers.
I’ll have to come clean I got my 7900xt from elsewhere and had received a nice £80 discount (off £750 list price) so actually paid £670 which I think is a steal for the performance I got. (50% cost of a 4080 but nearly all the rasterisation performance)
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Posts
5,740
Location
from the internet
Both are bad relative to what we would have gotten historically. There are many potential reasons for this. I think if anything we're not blaming Apple enough for hoovering up a huge percentage of TSMC's capacity on 5nm and 3nm. But I wouldn't be shocked if AMD and Nvidia were found to be engaging in collusion/price fixing. The whole $100 memory upsell on the 4060 ti is just nakedly greedy though and is probably an indication of the margins on the rest of their products.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
14 Aug 2009
Posts
2,930
A 4090 offers +70% performance for +7% more cost, a 4080 on the other hand offers +48% more performance at +72% more cost, can you not see just how poor that is?
Well, 3090 was poorly priced to begin with.

3080 was $700, 4090 is 86% faster at $1600 aka about 129% more money. Not a good deal.

Maybe it looked good compared to 4080, because 4080 it was only 49% faster for 71% more money vs 3080, while 4090 vs 3090 was 63% faster for only 7%more money, but is a skewed comparison, because, as I've mentioned before, 3090 was a bad deal...
Of course, the elephant in the room, extra vRAM and DLSS3 which gives/will give extra performance on top for both compared to 3080, so it will sweeten the deal even more for 4080.

Right now, cheapest 4080 from where I usually buy is about 1260 euros. Cheapest 4090 is 1831 euros. 45% more money for about 25-30% more performance. Not really a great deal. Then add on top the possible need of a new PSU/case, a lot more heat and power used which you may cause a free sauna or the need for A/C etc. :)

So depends what your point of comparison is and how good is in itself. 3090 isn't great.
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
12,019
Location
Uk
Well, 3090 was poorly priced to begin with.

3080 was $700, 4090 is 86% faster at $1600 aka about 129% more money. Not a good deal.

Maybe it looked good compared to 4080, because 4080 it was only 49% faster for 71% more money vs 3080, while 4090 vs 3090 was 63% faster for only 7%more money, but is a skewed comparison, because, as I've mentioned before, 3090 was a bad deal...
Of course, the elephant in the room, extra vRAM and DLSS3 which gives/will give extra performance on top for both compared to 3080, so it will sweeten the deal even more for 4080.

Right now, cheapest 4080 from where I usually buy is about 1260 euros. Cheapest 4090 is 1831 euros. 45% more money for about 25-30% more performance. Not really a great deal. Then add on top the possible need of a new PSU/case, a lot more heat and power used which you may cause a free sauna or the need for A/C etc. :)

So depends what your point of comparison is and how good is in itself. 3090 isn't great.
People who were already comfortable with paying $1.5k + got a deal this time, people who were comfortable with paying $700 didn't.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Aug 2009
Posts
2,930
People who were already comfortable with paying $1.5k + got a deal this time, people who were comfortable with paying $700 didn't.
True, if coming from a 3080 there isn't a terrific value in 4070ti.

But if you had money for a 3090 and made the smart move with a 3080 and kept $800, now adding those, plus what you'd get for a 3080sh, maybe a bit more and you'd get a 4080 which should be fine if you're happy with the performance. Keep the difference to 4090 towards a future buy.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
12,019
Location
Uk
I think I got a decent uplift (>200fps in MW2, >150fps in Horizon Zero Dawn, 110FPS on ultra TLOU all at 1440p) and a cracking deal for £670.
Thought you said you paid £750

What were Nv thinking releasing a £800 card with only 12gb vram?!? (4070ti). They must think the majority are fools. I needed an upgrade but decided against Nv this gen and instead went with £750 7900XT which made more financial sense and for longevity.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
12,019
Location
Uk
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom