7900XT says Hi
<- Gsync Monitor + loving me some of that FG!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
7900XT says Hi
Don't get the 4070Ti ffs, 12GB kills it dead.<- Gsync Monitor + loving me some of that FG!
Not a lot but modern GSync monitors can use VRR on both vendors but that doesn't help if you are running something that predates that changeWhat's so good about Gsync Monitor ? I always just went with gsync compatible so have 2 options open and don't get trapped into just having one option for GPU
Don't get the 4070Ti ffs, 12GB kills it dead.
What's so good about Gsync Monitor ? I always just went with gsync compatible so have 2 options open and don't get trapped into just having one option for GPU
There are some advantages to the G-Sync module, but most people in this context will, as above, be running monitors from before G-Sync compatible was a thing.
VESA Adaptive Sync/G-Sync compatible is an inferior spec none the less - which was developed by hacking pre-existing functionality not intended for this use such as panel self-refresh into an adaptive sync feature. The G-Sync module has better ability to boost pixel response times, better low-frame rate handling and recovery and better support (when MS doesn't keep messing with the way Windows display model works and breaking it) for non-exclusive fullscreen and window modes in games and applications amongst several other slight advantages. But there are some people who have a vested interest in saying they are both the same despite that not being objectively true.
Unfortunately it seems to be the way in this space things happen - one vendor or another comes out with a superior technology and then we end up adopting a lesser version of it and for some reason a lot of people seem overjoyed about that...
Personally I'd prefer to have a G-Sync module but they seem to now sadly be exclusive to super high end monitor over the £1000 mark.
I did want to get an Alienware Ultrawide OLED that had the module but they stopped making them.
Probably my next main gaming monitor won't have the module, but I'd rather have one. I've a mix of G-Sync and G-Sync compatible monitors and though I'm happy with the ones without the module (EDIT: Mostly - some are better than others, surprisingly one of the better ones is the Philips 436M6 despite only being 48-60Hz) I do notice the difference.
There are a couple of downsides as well to the G-Sync module - on some displays if you aren't careful it can cause transient image retention problems, I'm guessing due to the variable overdrive maybe slightly overdoing things and in some cases white content can look choppy due to the way it tries to preserve clarity in motion.
Some older FreeSync monitors really are not great though - I can only assume people have not actually used a proper G-Sync module monitor in comparison.
Also it seems it's not so great for ray reconstruction either (for now at least), whereas it's great on the 4080/4090:Yeh I know
Also it seems it's not so great for ray reconstruction either (for now at least), whereas it's great on the 4080/4090:
Also it seems it's not so great for ray reconstruction either (for now at least), whereas it's great on the 4080/4090:
Edit* Oh yeah just seen this, 5090 leaked:
Also it seems it's not so great for ray reconstruction either (for now at least), whereas it's great on the 4080/4090:
Edit* Oh yeah just seen this, 5090 leaked:
Also it seems it's not so great for ray reconstruction either (for now at least), whereas it's great on the 4080/4090:
Edit* Oh yeah just seen this, 5090 leaked:
wish.com copy.
AMD should really focus on invented new technologies for themselves instead of literatly just copying Nvidia like they've done for the last 10 to 15 years
Because not everyone cares about RT at the moment.Regarding the video above:
Not to troll the AMD crowd, but I was thinking to myself the other day why are people even buying AMD cards atm. There is nothing outside of more vram and being cheaper which is attractive about the AMD GPUs over the the Nvidia cards atm.
But why would I want a cheaper card with more vram which doesn't have the same level of RT and upscaling technology as the Nvidia cards.
What's the point in having more vram when the performance and features aren't there to make use of it.
:/