Confirmed is perhaps too strong a word as most things are rumours but yes, TweakTown claimed they've been sitting in warehouses since August.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA 4000 Series
- Thread starter MrClippy
- Start date
Permabanned
LOOOOOL NO
Personally i think they'll be priced around the same as the 30 series launched for, give or take $100.
4090 - $1499
4080 - $799/699 for the 10 GB
4070 - $499 (not that i think they'll announce the price of this one tomorrow)
Then add $100-200 for AIB cards.
4090 - $1499
4080 - $799/699 for the 10 GB
4070 - $499 (not that i think they'll announce the price of this one tomorrow)
Then add $100-200 for AIB cards.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,791
Whatever the prices are AMD will price their line-up £50 under and call it a day 
Ya gotta love a duopoly, amirite!??
Ya gotta love a duopoly, amirite!??
Last edited:
Whatever the prices are AMD will price their line-up £50 under and call it a day
Ya gotta love a duopoly, amirite!??
We'll see. The 4060 type card will probably be better than a 3070 Ti ($599). They'll say it is a 20% improvement in performance per $.
Last gen they underpriced the 3060 ti. They won't be making the same mistake.
Last edited:
Permabanned
I agree with waiting and seeing, if 60 range are in the 500 dollar segment I will say bye bye to Nvidia next round.
The 3060ti was popular because #1 it was the best card for mining #2 it was 20% cheaper than a 3070 for only a 10% performance difference and #3 because the 3060 12gb sucked.
So it was underpriced then. The 3070 was 25% more expensive for 10% performance as your said.
But actually checking that it was a larger performance gap.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Specs
NVIDIA GA104, 1665 MHz, 4864 Cores, 152 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 8192 MB GDDR6, 1750 MHz, 256 bit
Eitehr way, the 3070 was also priced very well. If the 70 card goes up, then so does the 60/60ti.
Last edited:
Permabanned
I got the 3070 as it was like 50 pounds more when the price boom was going on and yeah no offense, the 3070 is a much faster card than just 10% lol, people stick to the beginning of the release as some sort of headline, kinda weird.So it was underpriced then. The 3070 was 25% more expensive for 10% performance as your said.
But actually checking that it was a larger performance gap.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Specs
NVIDIA GA104, 1665 MHz, 4864 Cores, 152 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 8192 MB GDDR6, 1750 MHz, 256 bitwww.techpowerup.com
Eitehr way, the 3070 was also priced very well. If the 70 card goes up, then so does the 60/60ti.
AMD won't be massively undercutting Nvidia.
The 6700 XT which was similar to the 3060 Ti, came out at $479.
www.techpowerup.com
I think $499 will be that tier level this generation.
edit:
Just to add a second performance level source. Tied in the HUB/Techspot comparison.
www.techspot.com
The 6700 XT which was similar to the 3060 Ti, came out at $479.
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Specs
AMD Navi 22, 2581 MHz, 2560 Cores, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 12288 MB GDDR6, 2000 MHz, 192 bit
I think $499 will be that tier level this generation.
edit:
Just to add a second performance level source. Tied in the HUB/Techspot comparison.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs. Radeon RX 6700 XT
In the best scenario for AMD, the Radeon 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti occupy the same price point. That being the case, it'll be interesting...
www.techspot.com
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2019
- Posts
- 1,002
I think there's a high chance the 4060 Ti will be, but I wouldn't get your hopes up of AMD being that much cheaper though.
Permabanned
A weird bit of trivia...
GF100 has 4 GPCs each capable of 8 pixels per clock. This limits complete GPU to 32 pixels per clock and because of that it can't feed all 48 ROPs when they all require data at the same time.
Additional ROPs however can be used for MSAA (because it doesn't require additional data from rasterizers, while giving more work to ROPs.)
The GTX 480 could have MSAA enabled essentially for free depending on the circumstances.
GF100 has 4 GPCs each capable of 8 pixels per clock. This limits complete GPU to 32 pixels per clock and because of that it can't feed all 48 ROPs when they all require data at the same time.
Additional ROPs however can be used for MSAA (because it doesn't require additional data from rasterizers, while giving more work to ROPs.)
The GTX 480 could have MSAA enabled essentially for free depending on the circumstances.
Soldato
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition has been pictured - VideoCardz.com
Next-gen flagship RTX 40 GPU leaks ahead of official announcement In case there was any doubt, here’s Jensen with RTX 4090. NVIDIA is set to announce its RTX 4090 flagship Ada GPU in just a couple of hours. Many of you were wondering how NVIDIA’s own design might look, and we can finally tell...
videocardz.com
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition has been pictured - VideoCardz.com
Next-gen flagship RTX 40 GPU leaks ahead of official announcement In case there was any doubt, here’s Jensen with RTX 4090. NVIDIA is set to announce its RTX 4090 flagship Ada GPU in just a couple of hours. Many of you were wondering how NVIDIA’s own design might look, and we can finally tell...
Such a bad photoshop.
I have no doubt the 4090 looks exactly like that, but there is no way that's an official Nvidia marketing photo
Last edited:
Thanks that makes sense. I've been pc gaming since 2006 and the cards I owned from 2006 to 2012 all lost a huge amount of performance when e
Thanks that's interesting. I've been pc gaming since 2006 and the cards I owned from 2006 to 2012 all lost a huge amount of performance when enabling msaa, but these days I don't see it - like there is little performance difference between msaa times 0/2/4 or even 8 on a 3090 in the few games today that still use msaa, like the latest forza game or counter strike global offensive - though the reason maybe different to the gtx480
Last edited:
Associate
Nvidia preparing for new card announcements.
Soldato
If the leaked specs for the 4090 to the 4080 16GB are anywhere close to correct then the 4090 with 68% more CUDA cores and SM's (16384 vs 9728 and 128 vs 76) is looking like they have gone all in to ensure they can say they have the fastest consumer grade GPU, I think they will market it as a gaming card this time around though, none of the tom foolery from the 3090 marketing.
That does beg the question around price though something that has 68% more cores, must mean that the 4090 will need to be $1799 and they'll have the 4080 (16GB) at $949, with the 4070 at $579.
That does beg the question around price though something that has 68% more cores, must mean that the 4090 will need to be $1799 and they'll have the 4080 (16GB) at $949, with the 4070 at $579.