NVIDIA 4000 Series

[muon]

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Specs

NVIDIA AD104, 2475 MHz, 5888 Cores, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 12288 MB GDDR6X, 1313 MHz, 192 bit

www.techpowerup.com

You can see that card was supposed to be a 4070.

Even the clock speeds and 285W TDP were spot on.

 

[Oberon]

I simply cannot comprehend paying £950 - £1250 for a GPU. I thought I was mad when I was looking at getting an £800 6900 XT. These prices are detached from reality.

 

[RavenXXX2]

So you thought you could get a 4080 aka 4070ti for just under a grand, forget it.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1572267126475350018

 

[V F]

Remember that feeling back in March/April/May 2017 pre-ordering a 1080Ti? I was so hyped. How come I'm not getting that feeling this time?

 

[subbytna]

Nvidia shareholders right now:

Kaapstad you mean

 

[Purgatory]

So you thought you could get a 4080 aka 4070ti for just under a grand, forget it.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1572267126475350018

You really can't make this stuff up...


EVGA ran for their life just in time with this Nvidia BS.

 

[HACO]

Gotcha. Colour me very disappointed.

Yeah, every piece of information makes this worse and worse.

This launch needed to come with a big price cut to be good value, not a 2x price jump.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Specs

NVIDIA AD104, 2475 MHz, 5888 Cores, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 12288 MB GDDR6X, 1313 MHz, 192 bit

www.techpowerup.com

You can see that card was supposed to be a 4070.

Even the clock speeds and 285W TDP were spot on.

Freaking disgraceful.

 

[gpuerrilla]

Mindshare still going to fall over anyone to pick these up though.

 

[muon]

I bet the 3080 12gb will beat the 4080 12gb in some scenarios.

 

[Purgatory]

Remember that feeling back in March/April/May 2017 pre-ordering a 1080Ti? I was so hyped. How come I'm not getting that feeling this time?

Because it's Turing all over again with 40 series and stupidly higher pricing on 80 range.

 

[brostradamus]

thinking abt it a full upgrade path this gen is going to be prohibitively expensive, x670 motherboards too have been priced a bit out of range, the thing is i dont ascribe high value to motherboards theyre just supposed to glue other components together, and i believe thats how most enthusiasts perceive motherboards

 

[Kashinoda]

From le Reddit

Digital Foundry has a real, actual 4090 that they're testing out. They put out a teaser video that has enough information to figure out that like for like (Both with DLSS 2) , the 4090 is only about 1.5-1.6x faster than 3090Ti !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyGWFI1cuZQ

Data point 1: DLSS3 is 389%, while DLSS3 is 255.4% (Both 4090) This means DLSS 2 is 0.656x of DLSS 3. Note, the baseline is 4090 with DLSS off.

Data point 2: DLSS2 3090Ti is 100%, while DLSS 3 4090 is 235.8%. Multiplying by 0.66x (the difference b/w DLSS 2 & 3, we get 154%, which is the true performance uplift vs 3090Ti.

Needless to say, super disappointing and well below what leatherJacketMan claimed (2x - 4x uplift).

 

[muon]

Guess how many more cuda cores it has.

 

[V F]

From le Reddit

Marketing lies again? Surely not? That's impossible. Marketing people never lie.

 

[HACO]

From le Reddit

Nice, so if we extrapolate a little more this means 4080 16G will be a little better than a 3080 Ti and 4080 12G will be a little better than 3080 12G.

 

[Nexus18]

And someone else's calculations from Reddit:

Back of the envelope calculation on this video, 4090 is 62.8% faster than 3090 Ti

Key points

At around 2:05 - Cyberpunk 2077 with a 12900K and 4090, Native 4k vs 4k DLSS2 vs 4K DLSS3 - DLSS2 is 246.9% framerate of native, and DLSS3 is 367.1% framerate of native. That implies DLSS 3 is a 48.7% uplift off of DLSS 2

At around 2:20 - Cyberpunk 2077 with a 12900k, 3090 Ti, and 4k DLSS2 vs 12900k, 4090, 4k DLSS3 - 4090 DLSS 3 is 242% framerate of 3090 Ti DLSS 2

If we assumed a hypothetical 3090 Ti DLSS3 would run 48% better (from the first comparison above), that would mean the comparison between 4090 DLSS 3 is 162.8% framerate of the hypothetical 3090 Ti DLSS3

Caveat: Digital Foundry is running RT on, so this improvement includes improvements to RT cores. Likely lower uplift with pure raster

 

[fantasticCG]

Your kidney and a foot. October 12th

Actual price is already on their website

Ahahahahaha thanks

 

[tommoT.Striker]

All those 4090s are HUGE. I haven't seen any 4 slots variants, but the height of the cards is insane. With more performance comes more power (+cooling). Didn't see any data on the rendering performance, let alone any specific FP16, FP32 performance, but for creatives on 3090s, no burning reason to change.

Toyed with the idea of replacing my 2080 with a 4090, the power should be OK, but could not conceivably fit any of those 4090s in my case.

Surprised by the 4080 prices, especially the 4080 16GB, ouch!

 

[mrk]

Marketing lies again? Surely not? That's impossible. Marketing people never lie.

Trying to make use 30xx FE buyers feel bad but ultimately failing!

 

[Poneros]

From le Reddit

It's way worse than that. The thing is RT at 4K (in demanding games) hits all GPUs like a truck, so performance gains can appear disproportional compared to lower resolutions, which is what you'd get with DLSS/FSR and it's how you'd actually play the game. They've not shown any real DLSS 2 comparisons with RT for Ampere vs Lovelace.

Remember, if they're showing Cyberpunk with 4090 running <30fps then that means a 3090 is in like low 20s at best, so it's easy to have huge, fake, jumps.