NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Specs
NVIDIA AD104, 2475 MHz, 5888 Cores, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 12288 MB GDDR6X, 1313 MHz, 192 bit
You can see that card was supposed to be a 4070.
Even the clock speeds and 285W TDP were spot on.
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA 4000 Series
- Thread starter MrClippy
- Start date
You can see that card was supposed to be a 4070.
Even the clock speeds and 285W TDP were spot on.
Associate
I simply cannot comprehend paying £950 - £1250 for a GPU. I thought I was mad when I was looking at getting an £800 6900 XT. These prices are detached from reality.
Soldato
So you thought you could get a 4080 aka 4070ti for just under a grand, forget it.
Soldato
You really can't make this stuff up...
EVGA ran for their life just in time with this Nvidia BS.
Yeah, every piece of information makes this worse and worse.
This launch needed to come with a big price cut to be good value, not a 2x price jump.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Specs
NVIDIA AD104, 2475 MHz, 5888 Cores, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 12288 MB GDDR6X, 1313 MHz, 192 bitwww.techpowerup.com
You can see that card was supposed to be a 4070.
Even the clock speeds and 285W TDP were spot on.
Freaking disgraceful.
Soldato
Mindshare still going to fall over anyone to pick these up though.
Associate
thinking abt it a full upgrade path this gen is going to be prohibitively expensive, x670 motherboards too have been priced a bit out of range, the thing is i dont ascribe high value to motherboards theyre just supposed to glue other components together, and i believe thats how most enthusiasts perceive motherboards
Marketing lies again? Surely not? That's impossible. Marketing people never lie.
Nice, so if we extrapolate a little more this means 4080 16G will be a little better than a 3080 Ti and 4080 12G will be a little better than 3080 12G.
Last edited:
Soldato
Ahahahahaha thanks
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2019
- Posts
- 460
All those 4090s are HUGE. I haven't seen any 4 slots variants, but the height of the cards is insane. With more performance comes more power (+cooling). Didn't see any data on the rendering performance, let alone any specific FP16, FP32 performance, but for creatives on 3090s, no burning reason to change.
Toyed with the idea of replacing my 2080 with a 4090, the power should be OK, but could not conceivably fit any of those 4090s in my case.
Surprised by the 4080 prices, especially the 4080 16GB, ouch!
Toyed with the idea of replacing my 2080 with a 4090, the power should be OK, but could not conceivably fit any of those 4090s in my case.
Surprised by the 4080 prices, especially the 4080 16GB, ouch!
Man of Honour
Trying to make use 30xx FE buyers feel bad but ultimately failing!
It's way worse than that. The thing is RT at 4K (in demanding games) hits all GPUs like a truck, so performance gains can appear disproportional compared to lower resolutions, which is what you'd get with DLSS/FSR and it's how you'd actually play the game. They've not shown any real DLSS 2 comparisons with RT for Ampere vs Lovelace.
Remember, if they're showing Cyberpunk with 4090 running <30fps then that means a 3090 is in like low 20s at best, so it's easy to have huge, fake, jumps.