Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
take away the motion smoothing fake frames and you can probably divide the fps by 2 or more... DLSS seems to have turned into a scam to fake boost fpsOh nvidia you sus
doesnt mean it feels smoother and they arent real frames soo...
there's a lot of supposition on his part without any actual info, like if nvidia are waiting for extra frames and then back-interpolating the extra frame, that would be completely retarded from a performance/latency point of viewOh nvidia you sus
I didnt see that thank you.
RT is an extremely complex way of doing things, its like one of those NP hard combinatorial problems where you have to got to look at everything before knowing the actual solution.. infact i dont beleive RT complexity will ever scale well with hardware because of cost/tech restrictions.. so you'd need some ingenious new way of abstracting that complexity while delivering an image at acceptable quality loss.. as the leather jacket man said, you'd need new algorithms/methods to deliver realtime RT so i dont think adding more RT cores could solve the problem
What a bargain! This must draw a higher number of watts or something than the reference design to justify this higher price?
it has an Asus sticker on it that it over 9000
Asus tax, should have known. Not sure if I trust going with another strix after my 3090 strix died after a year!
AMD won't have the capacity to supply enough cards to fulfil demand anyway, so they won't go much cheaper
How come? FE is 1679...
Way way to dear lol..
