• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA 780 Ti Announced (18/10/13)

If you are running 4 memory modules, try taking 2 out and running 3dmark11.

CBA i gave up on it.To be honest mate it would have taken 5GHZ and 2400-2600 on the memory to break 10,000 as i saw a german chap on one of the overclocking forums just break 10k on his custom WC loop and his 3570k was at 5100mhz or so.

I think 12K is the new 10k this time.For the average joe like myself it can be a real bitch to break with a stable overclock.
 
No on 4770k i need to update my sig i have sold my rig in sig and im now replacing the core parts with 4770k etc.Boomsticks 4600mhz 4770k got around 11,500 physics on 3DM11.


If you find me someone with 12K though as a 24/7 overclock let me know.

12k on the above setup should be easy, you really need to talk to 8 Pack about memory timings as this will make a big difference.
 
It won't be a full fat GK110, these are way to valuable to NVidia for use elsewhere.

Jen-Hsun Huang said it was the fastest GPU that they have built? I'm hoping that doesn't mean just faster clocks.. Gonna be optimistic and expect more cores than Titan and clocked at about 950mhz - 1050mhz boost at stock. A true gaming flagship.
 
No on 4770k i need to update my sig i have sold my rig in sig and im now replacing the core parts with 4770k etc.Boomsticks 4600mhz 4770k got around 11,500 physics on 3DM11.


If you find me someone with 12K though as a 24/7 overclock let me know.

That makes more sense :)

You should be able to break 12k with i7.

If you want it to be 24/7 overclock then you probably need to delid it.
 
Jen-Hsun Huang said it was the fastest GPU that they have built? I'm hoping that doesn't mean just faster clocks.. Gonna be optimistic and expect more cores than Titan and clocked at about 950mhz - 1050mhz boost at stock. A true gaming flagship.

There is a clue that it is intended to come in under the Titan in the line up as it only has 3 way SLI support like the GTX 780, this is pointing to an overclocked GK110 with 12 or 13 active SMX modules.
 
That makes more sense :)

You should be able to break 12k with i7.

If you want it to be 24/7 overclock then you probably need to delid it.


I do not know if this is entirely true though.Some would say my 3570k needed the same treatment but what i said back then in regard to my temps is now universal for most Haswell users.They face benchmark and prime temps that are 95C.I was not even able to run IBT on my IVY as i hit 105c.

When you run a game it will never go above 80C.It is fine just do not run Prime and use Crysis or big hitting games as stress testers.Even OCUK have a disclaimer about running stress tests on thier Haswell bundles.And from my experience on IVY i never once failed prime opr IBT yet i got a black game bsod after 4 hours of chivalry.Some games trigger instability that not even IBT can find.And they run at lower overall temps.


Hot is in fashion again ;)
 
Last edited:
"Stutter, lag and tearing - that is as frustrating, as undesirable for a PC gamer as foot fungus"

Bang On. This is why I prefer Nvidia. It's dealing with the issues that matter. It took AMD forever to admit to frame syncing issues. That and terrible drivers I used for a year on the 7970m. Nvidia drivers are just plain better, better for SLI and better in general. They have the features I want and use. Adaptive Vsync. Digital vibrance they came out with first. AMD's equivalent is just not as good imo. Scaling to wonky resolutions for my old hd tv. AMD won't do it, with Nvidia it works. Nvidia just always seem to be a step ahead.
 
"Stutter, lag and tearing - that is as frustrating, as undesirable for a PC gamer as foot fungus"

Bang On. This is why I prefer Nvidia. It's dealing with the issues that matter. It took AMD forever to admit to frame syncing issues. That and terrible drivers I used for a year on the 7970m. Nvidia drivers are just plain better, better for SLI and better in general. They have the features I want and use. Adaptive Vsync. Digital vibrance they came out with first. AMD's equivalent is just not as good imo. Scaling to wonky resolutions for my old hd tv. AMD won't do it, with Nvidia it works. Nvidia just always seem to be a step ahead.

well it nice u have a open mind about it :)
the nvidias ppls front all eating otters noses
 
well it nice u have a open mind about it :)
the nvidias ppls front all eating otters noses

Haha yeah, sounds a bit ranty now that I read it back, but I'm very excited about G-sync. Surprised no one came up with a solution earlier but hey it's soon to be here now.
 
I don't know but I suspect it could be in your possession before anyone gets their R9 290X.

Shame really this is probably true. AMD have such great vision and fumble so badly on delivery. A lot of people will be considering holding off buying 290X's now to see what Nvidia's new card is like and how much the non ti 780 drops in price. Oh well, back on topic. I do hope the ti isn't just a highly clocked 780, I think / hope it will be the full 2880 cores and a decent clock at stock. Nvidia want a flagship gaming GPU, to have gaming performance crown. It wouldn't really affect Titan as really that is a different product, kind of an anomaly. Probably winding down Kepler sales in Tegra markets and Titan tapering off now anyway, moving onto Maxwell soon. A full Kepler part on mature process could be likely? Wishful thinking? Lol.
 
I'll be happy to be proven wrong but nvidia have always been better with monitor technology including 3D.

Not on the basis of multi-monitor before gtx600 series, Ati from 5000 had the advantage of only needing 1 card to run eyefinity up to 6 screens but expensive dp.adapters etc. Due to nvidias failure of v1 fermi on the 40nm process they never managed to make a dual gpu single card on broken fermi. Nvidia needed sli for multi-monitor support, the gtx 590 fermi v2 was the only single nvidia card to provide support for more than 2 monitors, But in comparison to the 6990 the 590 lacked enough vram and was slower especially at higher resolution/running 3 screens or more. On 3d and other monitor tech I can't comment as haven't used 3d but Nvidia had a better solution and support than Amd.
 
Mine will do 2500mhz 9-11-11-25 1T 96 without any extra volts, I can get them up to 2600mhz 10-12-12-31 1T but the performance is no where near as good as it is between 2400mhz to 2500mhz.

If I was using them on Haswell I could probably go higher but the performance would be poor.

Buy some haswell goodness and find out? :D Getting great scaling on my new set of PSC, just tweaking it but 2600 8-12-8-28-1T-96 at 1.9v is looking promising!

The IMC and options available is outstanding, I'd think with some volts on haswell you could tighten down on your 2600 profile (hitting 2600mhz alone is amazing for SB-E!) :)

2400 C8 bested 2933 C12 in my testing with superPI 32m, by a good 11 seconds. Which in the world of SPI is a monumentally big gap :)
 
Last edited:
Jen-Hsun Huang said it was the fastest GPU that they have built? I'm hoping that doesn't mean just faster clocks.. Gonna be optimistic and expect more cores than Titan and clocked at about 950mhz - 1050mhz boost at stock. A true gaming flagship.

With a good price point to!!!
 
A 780 with a few more cuda cores unlocked and more memory is just silly IMO, The performance difference between these 780's will be tiny, Why not just bring the Titans price down instead of releasing this "Scraping the bottom of the barrel" idea.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom