• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Thread**

I don't think that's actually true.

GP100 has all the FP64 cores, which add nothing to gaming performance but increase heat and decrease clockspeeds.

The full unlocked core only has 3840 FP32 cores, vs 3584 on the Titan XP. I wouldn't be surprised if GP100 can't hit above 1800 MHz, in which case the GP102 core probably ends up faster (or equal) in gaming.

GP100 has 256 more CUDA cores, plus HBM2 memory. It would annihilate the Titan XP, but it's not available for us mere mortals :p
 
TitanXP still slower than GP100 :) Us ordinary folk can't even purchase one :D

I think you will find the Pascal Titan is faster as GP100 is not known for its overclocking ability.

I5MGFdK.jpg


I don't think the above who stand a chance against a watercooled Pascal Titan which can hit 2100mhz.

If you still don't believe it here is an article explaining why the GP100 would not be very good as a gaming card.

http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/07/29/will-nvidia-corporations-gp100-ever-become-a-titan.aspx
 
I think you will find the Pascal Titan is faster as GP100 is not known for its overclocking ability.

I5MGFdK.jpg


I don't think the above who stand a chance against a watercooled Pascal Titan which can hit 2100mhz.

If you still don't believe it here is an article explaining why the GP100 would not be very good as a gaming card.

http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/07/29/will-nvidia-corporations-gp100-ever-become-a-titan.aspx

GP100 has HBM2 - which will give it a massive memory bandwidth gain over the Titan XP. This alone would make it completely destroy the TitanXP, yet alone the 256 additional cores.

Watercool a GP100 and it would be a complete monster.
 
GP100 has HBM2 - which will give it a massive memory bandwidth gain over the Titan XP. This alone would make it completely destroy the TitanXP, yet alone the 256 additional cores.

Watercool a GP100 and it would be a complete monster.

Go on then find some waterblocks for a GP100 !!!!

Also HBM overclocks badly and still has latency problems, I suspect this is the reason they did not want it on the Pascal Titan. NVidia did not want to have a Fury X overclockers dream on their hands.

Almost forgot Tesla P100 has the same amount of active cores as the Pascal Titan.
 
GP100 has HBM2... This alone would make it completely destroy the TitanXP

Lol, what?

Please show me a gaming scenario where Titan X Pascal's 480GB/s is fully saturated and becomes the bottleneck for its performance.

Hell, GTX1070 only has 256GB/s (half of Fury X!) and it runs about as fast as you'd expect, given the core config, at 4K.
 
The clock speeds it has mean nothing as they're just for a Tesla setup. However, the fact of the matter is that we'll never know, unless they release it next year as a Titan X Black Edition or something.

To conclude, the point's moot. Where's my 1080Ti please? I want it yesterday.
 
My question is.

Would the 1080ti be a good upgrade on two 980ti hybrids. I'm going to take the gsync plunge on black friday to fully utilize the sli.

On a purely aesthetic side, two cards look better than one. Both cards never go over 72c on full load stress testing so upgrading for less heat isn't an issue
 
My question is.

Would the 1080ti be a good upgrade on two 980ti hybrids. I'm going to take the gsync plunge on black friday to fully utilize the sli.

On a purely aesthetic side, two cards look better than one. Both cards never go over 72c on full load stress testing so upgrading for less heat isn't an issue

Tbf 980Ti will still do a really good job for a while yet (unless you're on 4k and like to max the settings :D)
 
Say you was running a 6950 :( and you was going to finally upgrade.. Would you wait until 1080Ti or go for 1080 now? Also wanting that Samsung Gsync.
 
Say you was running a 6950 :( and you was going to finally upgrade.. Would you wait until 1080Ti or go for 1080 now? Also wanting that Samsung Gsync.

A 1080 would be a huge jump, so I'd just go for it.

The ti will be silly money anyway.

In fact the 1070 would be a big jump and much cheaper. Depends how much money you want to spend.
 
Say you was running a 6950 :( and you was going to finally upgrade.. Would you wait until 1080Ti or go for 1080 now? Also wanting that Samsung Gsync.

Well depends if you want new, shiny and overpriced or money saving and sensible.

Shiny and overpriced - 1080ti when released.

Sensible - 1080 at the reduced cost when the 1080ti comes out.

or just grab a 1080 on Black Friday
 
Say you was running a 6950 :( and you was going to finally upgrade.. Would you wait until 1080Ti or go for 1080 now? Also wanting that Samsung Gsync.

I'd get a 1070 now. Or wait for 1080ti and see how the land lies then (eg cheaper 1080s or something from amd). 1070 would be an excellent improvement over a 6950
 
Go on then find some waterblocks for a GP100 !!!!

Also HBM overclocks badly and still has latency problems, I suspect this is the reason they did not want it on the Pascal Titan. NVidia did not want to have a Fury X overclockers dream on their hands.

Almost forgot Tesla P100 has the same amount of active cores as the Pascal Titan.

P100 has HBM2, not HBM1. We ordinary folk don't know how well it performs or overclocks, though I'd assume it has extremely high performance due to the memory bandwidth it affords.

P100 = full fat Pascal. Anything else is cut down.
 
Back
Top Bottom