[ZiiP]carrot;26787731 said:I don't have space for 2 cards. And like I said, need to get an idea of the length of the thing!
What case do you have?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
[ZiiP]carrot;26787731 said:I don't have space for 2 cards. And like I said, need to get an idea of the length of the thing!
[ZiiP]carrot;26787941 said:Aerocool Dead Silence, but using bottom pci slot in my x79 extreme4-m for sound card!
[ZiiP]carrot;26788281 said:The width isn't a problem, I have 3 "slots" of space, it's the length of any card I have to worry about![]()
Any expectation on an 890 card being an early release, as the 690 was? If I remember correctly the 690 was released within a month or two of the 680. Given that the 890 seems to be the early/mid cards of the next gen, I wonder if they'll quickly cram two on on PCB.That will surely bring a nice performance boost over the current gen single chip cards
give me a cards for Witcher 3 maxed/near-maxed ill be happy
does anyone remember the rumoured release date? was it in sept or was their closer rumour?
Whats the point if you sell it due to needing money 1 month later?
I like how they haven't speculated a release price for the TITAN X
Looks to be an absolute beast though if true.
Can't see anything wrong with that.
GK210 would be about 560mm^2, so a big die again. the 980TI should be about 25% faster, and the Titan-X about 35% faster than the GTX 980.
The only thing i would question is "384Bit - 8GB" thats an odd bus width with even Memory.
I would not count it out as they did this on the GTX 660 with some Memory splicing. (192Bit - 2GB)
I'm looking at replacing my 290 mid to late next year. AMD or Nvidia, who ever offers me the most for my coin.
Until then i'm happy with what i have![]()
Turns out that people like cards that are faster than the previous gen, dropped the price levels by quite a bit and also don't turn your PC room into a sauna while gaming.
They got praise from reviewers because they were faster, put out less heat, and were a better value than anything else on the market. The competitor took too long to get their price cuts out (and they even claim they didn't cut the price which is ridiculous) to affect the press these cards were getting and here we are.
Also huge majority of the people buying these aren't upgrading from GK110 cards. So for the majority of buyers they do definitely perform better than their previous card. Most of the people buying them are going to be coming from 480s, 470s, 560Tis, 570s, 580s, 660Tis, 670s, 680s etc.
Clear upgrade for 95% of the potential buyers, good price, cool card, lots of good press and a nice feature stack = good sales.
I'm just worried about the state of the enthusiast community when cards with worse specs, bodge-job silicon and 5% performance gain are universally lauded. It's like everyone's gone mad. Then to top it off casual users rush out to buy it in droves, it sends a message that we can be safely ignored and not even catered to in the future.![]()