• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA GTX 970 OWNERS THREAD

Associate
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Posts
1,377
Location
London
Wow, I must have some crazy well-placed fans! My cards max'd out at 68c (top card) and 62c after 30 mins of Heaven :cool:

I also have the R4, what kind of airflow do you have? I have the 2 140mm in front and one in the back, nothing else. The single 970 went up to 67 during Heaven (and this might depend on graphical settings as well).
 
Associate
Joined
28 Jul 2004
Posts
469
Location
Finland
I went for the Gigabyte because I wanted the cherry picked GPU and the extra cooling. The problem for me is that the card is relatively speaking loud at idle. I know sound is subjective but my system has 0 moving parts when idling, and this makes 3x fans spinning at ~1500RPM sound intrusive. I am instead going to go for the cheaper plastic shroud MSI GTX 970 with 0db idle fans and no backplate. I will have lower overclocks but this is a compromise I will make.

I was afraid of this. I currently have MSI Gaming GTX 770 and at the lowest fan speed setting in Afterburner, it's still audible. Well, it was audible, then one of the fans broke and I swapped in an aftermarket cooler (MK-26) with couple of TY-141 coolers, but even those fans at the lowest setting Afterburner allows are still a bit noisy.

Long story short, I already ordered a GTX 970, specifically the Gigabyte G1 because the cooler had the most potential/headroom. Paid quite a bit premium too, but GPU cooling isn't the place I want to save money at. Still, I'd like the card to be very quiet when idle. Maybe I should have gone with MSI but so many people had fan issues with Twin Frozr IV models so I really didn't consider MSI this time around.

I wonder if Afterburner can be hacked to allow lower RPM settings. Currently it seems to not allow settings below 34% or so (seems to vary a bit between cards).
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
30,340
I also have the R4, what kind of airflow do you have? I have the 2 140mm in front and one in the back, nothing else. The single 970 went up to 67 during Heaven (and this might depend on graphical settings as well).

Same here but I have a 140mm at the bottom too blowing up at the bottom card (but I'm guessing it helps me all over). Def try it :D

My H75 is in a push/pull config at the rear :)

Altogether I'm very happy, cpu doesn't go over 60c when gaming either at 4.7Ghz! (delidded 4770k) :cool:

Just before next Summer I plan on adding a 240mm AiO at the top of the case (whichever is best performing at the time)

Stunned at the great temps and utter silence (at idle, not much higher when gaming/encoding)

edit - Have also removed top HDD cage as not needed)
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
4 Sep 2012
Posts
150
I wonder if Afterburner can be hacked to allow lower RPM settings. Currently it seems to not allow settings below 34% or so (seems to vary a bit between cards).

From experience your best bet is changing the setting in bios, even then most of the time it is hard capped at 30%. I managed to get my MSI GTX 560ti from 40% to 30% using a bios mod and no lower. My MSI GTX 670's both would not go lower than 30% fan speed. Same thing with my MSI R9 270. I just realised I actually buy a lot of MSI graphics cards :eek: No I am not a fan boy, I buy whatever seems best at the time of purchase :p

I think it could be something to do with the hardware fan controller used by the manufacturer.
 
Associate
Joined
4 Sep 2012
Posts
150
Does that read 1802mhz? Can't really see on phone. Doesn't valley misread core speed? On mine it gives a higher figure than it really is.

Valley always gave me the wrong core speed readings with my GTX 670's, it seemed to have read the max boost values in the bios instead of actual clock speed.
 
Associate
Joined
3 Mar 2012
Posts
293
gtx_970_3dmark11_sli_1582stock.png


My SLI GTX 970 result at 1582Mhz core clock and stock memory.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2003
Posts
13,454
Location
South Derbyshire
This is the temps I get after a few rounds of valley

At the top you have FPS and Frame times

GPU: TEMPS, GPU usage, Volts, Fan speed, Core speed.

Mem: Speed, usage in MB

I have made my own fan profle and anything up to 75% I can't hear over my very quiet case fans.

20140924_175111.jpg
 
Associate
Joined
7 May 2004
Posts
1,951
My 970s finally arrived and are setup.
I'm using after burner OSD but it's only showing a clock speed of 540mhz on both GPUs
My drivers are the latest nvidia ones

The rest of my system specs are :
4770k @ 4ghz
8gb ram
650watt psu
 
Associate
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Posts
49
Location
Wales, UK
Folks is there a great deal of difference in performance between the 970/980 and a 780 TI?

The only reason you would swap a 780Ti for a 970/980 is for the energy efficiency and new tech. If you have money to burn great, but you wont see much of a performance boost.

Then again, it might lop off a decent amount off your energy bills if you game a lot.
 
Back
Top Bottom