Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2008
- Posts
- 6,062
Sure but I've seen a few commentors who've tried freesynch and gysnch and pretty much confirm there's next to no difference. So you call it subjective to pay more for next to no difference as well? That sounds even more shallow as it ignores the context of the comparison we're actually making and just aims to be a blanket statement.
Depends on how you look at it? Who were the few commentators? Were they biased in anyway? I've read G-sync with Nvidia cards is simply a better soluition? But it's only what we've read. And wasn't G-sync out before Freesync? That can make a difference in both price and marketing tactics - hard to charge a premium for a technology that's already out there but can turn it to a marketing advantage by declaring it free and open to all which might not have been the case if the reverse was true?
Oh and I guess my statement was a bit of a blanket one I'm not looking closely at the argument here but it's no different than buying other products - value is subjective and simply stating I'm happy to pay more for a product under certain conditions as I deem value to be more than a simple cross comparison of performance.
I'd be happy to see an open standard on this now as it's no longer a new technoligy and agree with Troezar. PS, I was joking with the rising salaries comment

Last edited: