Obi Wan Kenobi (Disney+)

Caporegime
Joined
30 Jul 2013
Posts
29,034
Oh dear God... as Ackbar said "IT'S A TRAP!". The first episode with all its sanity and atmosphere-building was just a lure that led to a dark room of horrendous writing. Poor writing, certainly not the worst I have ever seen, but poor nonetheless. Contrived and convenient plot armour and hare-brained decisions by supposedly wise and powerful characters that I am sadly no longer surprised to see in big budget shows like this.

Do they need plot armor when we already know Obi-wan, Leia and Darth Vader survive?
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
92,068
Personally don't think it was a good idea to have the fight between Obi and Vader - having him hunting him added some decent tension but facing off feels misplaced and like it was done for the wrong reasons (production wise).

If it wasn't for the moments of lazy writing it would be quite good IMO.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
27,429
Location
Utopia
Do they need plot armor when we already know Obi-wan, Leia and Darth Vader survive?
I am (obviously) talking about lazy-ass writing that does not make a good attempt to have key characters make rational decisions and create believable (in the context of the setting) situations for their escape and survival. Creating believable situations involves effort and it is much harder to write and set up and direct, which is why it is increasingly rare in shows like this.

If you do not yet know the context of these kind of "convenient plot armour" discussions by now, considering how prevalent it is in so many lazy and poorly written shows in the last couple of decades, then I am surprised, because it's hardly a new discussion (though no less disappointing).

Personally don't think it was a good idea to have the fight between Obi and Vader - having him hunting him added some decent tension but facing off feels misplaced and like it was done for the wrong reasons (production wise).

If it wasn't for the moments of lazy writing it would be quite good IMO.

Yes it really took what should have been a dramatic and slow-burning confrontation and sucked all of the tension out of it by putting it too early in the show. It should have been a longer build up with more emotion and it just turned into an eye-rolling moment where Vader and all of his stormtroopers cannot apparently chase a slow and lumbering robot carrying a limp body over the next sand dune. Sigh.

Also just what is going on with Vaders chest lights... they are so glaringly bright with so much red and green he looks like a walking traffic light. It's just distractingly bad costume design vs the muted one of the original which I cannot understand why they did not keep.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
13 May 2003
Posts
8,891
The problem some of these shows and the sequel trilogy suffer is the more backstory that already exists the more careful you have to be to get it right. Disney don't seem to have shown the care and attention needed to do this. The Mandalorian gets a free pass because it's largely exploring new areas with new characters and only brings in legacy charcters like Bo-Katan, Ashoka, Luke and Bobba Fett as waypoints in it's own plot.
The lack of single guiding mind is glaringly obvious, the director gets to decide the plot and the universe must bend to accept it. When what is needed is a storytelling master craftsman who can thread their story neatly through what already exists.

It just feels wrong to have a mini Leia running around with Ben, it feels wrong that Vader and Ben would meet before A New Hope. Obi Wan feels weak and stupid which doesn't work but weak and wise would have.
 
Caporegime
Joined
8 Sep 2005
Posts
27,429
Location
Utopia
The problem some of these shows and the sequel trilogy suffer is the more backstory that already exists the more careful you have to be to get it right. Disney don't seem to have shown the care and attention needed to do this. The Mandalorian gets a free pass because it's largely exploring new areas with new characters and only brings in legacy charcters like Bo-Katan, Ashoka, Luke and Bobba Fett as waypoints in it's own plot.
The lack of single guiding mind is glaringly obvious, the director gets to decide the plot and the universe must bend to accept it. When what is needed is a storytelling master craftsman who can thread their story neatly through what already exists.

It just feels wrong to have a mini Leia running around with Ben, it feels wrong that Vader and Ben would meet before A New Hope. Obi Wan feels weak and stupid which doesn't work but weak and wise would have.
Yes absolutely this and you explained it succinctly and concisely with regards to respecting history and lore to make things consistent and believable. The "rule of cool" is applied by many writers to shoehorn in things like "Leia with sassy adult personality" etc and they just trust (or hope) that the majority of viewers will neither care nor notice, or if they do then not in enough numbers to make a big deal about it. Also you are right that the denigration of major characters by writing them as people with very low common sense and poor judgement, especially when those characters are in reality amongst the most wise and/or powerful of all humans in the universe, is not appropriate or credible. Yes, even the best of men make mistakes, but not all the time with trivial things.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Oct 2004
Posts
26,596
Location
....
Just watched the scene, what a joke. Disney should be ashamed of themselves. What a way to ruin two of the best characters to exist in Sci-fi.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jul 2013
Posts
29,034
If obi fights vadar, doesn't it break canon? I give up, star wars is a joke.

Technically no, as all that is said in Star Wars is:

"I sense something. I presence I've not felt since . . . "​


Then, later:

We meet again, at last. The circle is now complete. When I left you I was but the learner. Now, *I* am the master.
Obi-Wan: Only a master of evil, Darth.

So they never implicitly state where the last meeting was, and it's implied that Vader lost the battle.

It works if that was Episode III, but it also can work for them battling after the episode III fight.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Oct 2004
Posts
26,596
Location
....
Technically no, as all that is said in Star Wars is:



Then, later:



So they never implicitly state where the last meeting was, and it's implied that Vader lost the battle.

It works if that was Episode III, but it also can work for them battling after the episode III fight.


I suppose, it feels wrong though.

It just makes less sense, time scales of 8 years v 18. 'that's a name I've not heard in a long time' well 8 years as an old man isn't realisticly that long, and the same with the above. It just ruins that concept of a long time passing.

It feels cheap.
 
Associate
Joined
29 Sep 2011
Posts
10
Location
Some place in London
Yes absolutely this and you explained it succinctly and concisely with regards to respecting history and lore to make things consistent and believable. The "rule of cool" is applied by many writers to shoehorn in things like "Leia with sassy adult personality" etc and they just trust (or hope) that the majority of viewers will neither care nor notice, or if they do then not in enough numbers to make a big deal about it. Also you are right that the denigration of major characters by writing them as people with very low common sense and poor judgement, especially when those characters are in reality amongst the most wise and/or powerful of all humans in the universe, is not appropriate or credible. Yes, even the best of men make mistakes, but not all the time with trivial things.
Yep, this has been going on since the new trilogy movies. Rather than have someone who has overall control of the story to tie everything together and ensure the story arcs are done well, we had directors doing their own thing and adding things because "hey, it's cool" then suddenly going oh **** how are we going to tie all the loose ends together and have a coherent story....Whoops, better just make some **** up. At least George Lucas had that going for him.

I wonder if this should not fall at the feet of the person at the top of the tree, Kathleen Kennedy, she probably needs to go. This does seem to be a reoccurring theme with Disney though, just bash out content for your new streaming service, ticking a few of the "right boxes" and see what sticks.

Let's see how the next few episodes go but I am not holding any hope that it will get better.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
15 Jan 2006
Posts
32,426
Location
Tosche Station
It works if that was Episode III, but it also can work for them battling after the episode III fight.

I get what you're saying but this theoretical fight is now real, and Vader is in absolutely no way a learner in their encounter. They dropped the ball because they wanted to make it sooo eeeeepic.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
39,503
Location
Ireland
I get what you're saying but this theoretical fight is now real, and Vader is in absolutely no way a learner in their encounter. They dropped the ball because they wanted to make it sooo eeeeepic.

You could argue that vader is a learner in the dark side of the force, or a learner in regards to him being a Sith. Even Palpy says there's things that the Sith teach about the force they the jedi never would.

We don't really get a time frame on this either just that it's been years since they last met, is that 10-20 years or more? And how long does it take to learn enough about the dark side to become a "master" vs the light side as said above its implied there's more to learn about the dark side so it would take longer before you're considered a master.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
15 Jan 2006
Posts
32,426
Location
Tosche Station
You could argue that vader is a learner in the dark side of the force, or a learner in regards to him being a Sith. Even Palpy says there's things that the Sith teach about the force they the jedi never would.

We don't really get a time frame on this either just that it's been years since they last met, is that 10-20 years or more? And how long does it take to learn enough about the dark side to become a "master" vs the light side as said above its implied there's more to learn about the dark side.

But this is missing the point if the intent of his words in ANH. He says "when I left you I was but the learner but now I am the master", as in, you were the master of our last encounter and that this encounter will be different. This new completely mental scene completely ruins the later fight, that is unless Obi Wan somehow decides to un**** himself pronto and there's some smack down later in the series. I'm really just not interested tbh, Disney have utterly bungled this franchise.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
39,503
Location
Ireland
This new completely mental scene completely ruins the later fight, that is unless Obi Wan somehow decides to un**** himself pronto and there's some smack down later in the series. .
It's almost guaranteed thats going to happen, this little skirmish between the 2 won't be a one off.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
8,089
Location
Stoke/Norfolk
Hopefully after some training by Qui Gon.

[TeamAmerica] We're gonna to need a Montage!!! [/TeamAmerica] :D

I agree, I think there's a need for an "Obi-Wan is down/depressed, Qui-Gon comes to him and builds him back up, Obi-Wan then fights once more and kicks ass" type storyline but I'm not sure if we'll get that. Maybe just Qui-Gon appearing would be enough without the need for a training montage, who knows?
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Feb 2009
Posts
3,392
Location
Sunny Fife
Awaits a guest appearance from Master Yoda. :eek:
Wouldn’t shock me one bit, when they get desperate they always start chucking the most loved parts of the old films at it because that makes it all better.

Ok….I’ll fess up, I’d love to see Yoda but that’s not the point…hold on wait, that is the point isn’t it?

I think I had a point but I seem to have lost my way here. I’ll just sit back and enjoy the rest of the series…can I haz some millennium falcon too please?
 
Back
Top Bottom