* OcUK Crysis DX9 TopList *

Ranger07 · 22 Jan 2008 at 18:57

Im sure its installed as part of vista as standard but i'll double check, cheers.

HummuH1 · 23 Jan 2008 at 11:14

Ranger07 said:
Im sure its installed as part of vista as standard but i'll double check, cheers.

You're right. Plenty of ******' about last night with no joy.

The only thing I can think of is that the benchmark_gpu link from the Benchmark Tool isn't launching the benchmark_gpu.bin file in ...\Bin32 at all, or incorrectly.

Scougar · 23 Jan 2008 at 12:21

Was my result removed because I didn't have a valid screen shot?

Matthew

gurusan · 23 Jan 2008 at 12:27

Scougar said:
Was my result removed because I didn't have a valid screen shot?

Matthew

Dunno. I didn't remove it. Try submitting again.

spoony77 · 23 Jan 2008 at 14:06

40.09 with a q6600@3200mhz and a stock gtx
Seems a little low to me maybe i need to update my drivers to the crysis reccomended ones.

Scougar · 23 Jan 2008 at 14:55

gurusan said:
Dunno. I didn't remove it. Try submitting again.

Hmm, ok

I will do a proper GPU-Z (download it) later and resubmit. Nothing earth shattering anyway, only between 29-33 fps with 4x slot and 3870 on E4300 @ 2.66.

Matthew

Dougiebabe2003 · 24 Jan 2008 at 13:25

E6600 @ 3220mhz
Ati 2900XT @ Stock
4GB RAM @ 920mhz
Vista 64 Ultimate

31fps

I think that it must be running at the correct clocks so ignore the GPU-Z & Ati-Tool speeds me thinks

Buckster · 24 Jan 2008 at 18:16

I only get at the 1280x1024 1.7 fps difference between High and Very High ? Is that right ?

about 42 ish vs 43.7 (overclocked 8800GTS G92)

RobH · 24 Jan 2008 at 19:56

Yes! I'm 36th place now, not 114th, hopefully I'll get more fps when I reclock my CPU.

ten80p · 25 Jan 2008 at 12:06

Haven't had chance to take screeny and post but does 48fps seem about right ?

Q6600 @ 8x450 (3.6GHz) check sig below

Biohazard · 26 Jan 2008 at 01:35

Yeah sounds about right.

Think I've borked my card on the last benchmark, every game etc is running artifacts now...

bah

PCZ · 26 Jan 2008 at 14:15

Did another Crysis bench with a new CPU.
Gained a few FPS with it.

Suspect the extra cache helps more than the raw clock speed increase

65.125 fps
PCZ
e8500 @ 4400 mhz
8800 GTX SLI @ 632/1000
xp sp2 32bit

ten80p · 26 Jan 2008 at 14:31

^ thats a good clock @4.4
65fps spot on !

divuk83 · 26 Jan 2008 at 18:50

I notice that the benchmarking software is able to grasp Vista 64 but not XP 64. Everyone using vista is able to check the 64bit option, where as for XP64 users the option isn't there. Is there a way round this? I have the bin64 as the target directory.

Cheers

Dave

gurusan · 26 Jan 2008 at 18:51

^ I think it's a Vista only feature like the Very High settings

HeX · 26 Jan 2008 at 20:50

New run using 8800GTS 512:

Biohazard · 26 Jan 2008 at 23:34

PCZ said:
snip

Did you upgrade to take first place? lol

I am thinking about getting a E8xx, should give me a good boost with 4mb extra l2!

PCZ · 26 Jan 2008 at 23:57

Not really
Just wanted to play with Wolfdale.

Upgarding to improve Crysis benches significantly would involve getting faster Video Cards.
As NV don't seem to be in any hurry to release new tech that wil have to wait.

ozzaman · 27 Jan 2008 at 00:52

PCZ said:
As NV don't seem to be in any hurry to release new tech that wil have to wait.

Ooohhhh discounting the 3870X2 completely then....

PCZ · 27 Jan 2008 at 01:00

3800X2
They will be fine for gamers with Intel boards i guess.

The 9800 isn't exactly awe inspiring either
A pair of GTS's bolted together.

I suppose for a short period of time that will be the fastest card available.

Competitor rules

*** OcUK Crysis DX9 TopList ***

* OcUK Crysis DX9 TopList *