danza said:Fixed.
Damn, that's a real shame. Some cracking entries DQ'ed.
I was wondering about that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
danza said:Fixed.
Damn, that's a real shame. Some cracking entries DQ'ed.
DreederOcUK said:Unlucky, a lot of regulars there who im suprised have been dq`d, its a shame to lose so many entrants, maybe we need to look at relaxing the rules? surely two borders isnt such a serious offence to deserve DQ, maybe 5 points removed from total.![]()
To be fair, people should just read the rules. They aren't that hard to stick to and the single border one has been around for years. Marking could start getting really complicated, where do you draw the line with deducting marks? Some rules are a DQ others are a reduction in marks? You can't allow one rule to be bent and not another, that would be less fair in my opinion. The judges jobs are hard enough as it is. It may seem harsh but I think it's the only fair way.DreederOcUK said:Unlucky, a lot of regulars there who im suprised have been dq`d, its a shame to lose so many entrants, maybe we need to look at relaxing the rules? surely two borders isnt such a serious offence to deserve DQ, maybe 5 points removed from total.![]()
You cant argue with that. If your new to the comp you should be reading rules and if you dont and something is picked up on, its your own fault.Muban said:To be fair, people should just read the rules. They aren't that hard to stick to and the single border one has been around for years. Marking could start getting really complicated, where do you draw the line with deducting marks? Some rules are a DQ others are a reduction in marks? You can't allow one rule to be bent and not another, that would be less fair in my opinion. The judges jobs are hard enough as it is. It may seem harsh but I think it's the only fair way.
DreederOcUK said:Unlucky, a lot of regulars there who im suprised have been dq`d, its a shame to lose so many entrants, maybe we need to look at relaxing the rules? surely two borders isnt such a serious offence to deserve DQ, maybe 5 points removed from total.![]()
morgan said:what a crock....
the rule:
"Photos may have an optional border. If used, this must be a single colour and a reasonable size."
means many of us got the boot due to a 1 pixel width border...ha ha ha![]()
![]()
there is also this rule:
"Photographers must post their make and model unless it is provided in the EXIF Information."
does that mean that the people that didnt post the EXIF are also disqualified?!! where do you draw the line.
Think you guys need to seriously chill out as this is being very pedantic IMO. Been hanging out round these parts for years now and that was the first time I entered a comp...purely to join in the fun....and my work gets turned down for a 1 pixel line worth of border...dear ohh dear.
6 people dq'd for borders...surely its best to advise for next time? a lot of poeple spent a lot of time in setting up and taking thier shots and they have been dq'd for the most petty thing. lighten up guys fgs!
I doubt I'll join in again if this is the way it works...its a photography competition - people need to chill out.
morgan said:what a crock....
<SNIP> lighten up guys fgs!
I doubt I'll join in again if this is the way it works...its a photography competition - people need to chill out.
danza said:Fixed.
Damn, that's a real shame. Some cracking entries DQ'ed.
morgan said:people need to chill out.
morgan said:what a crock....
the rule:
"Photos may have an optional border. If used, this must be a single colour and a reasonable size."
means many of us got the boot due to a 1 pixel width border...ha ha ha![]()
![]()
there is also this rule:
"Photographers must post their make and model unless it is provided in the EXIF Information."
does that mean that the people that didnt post the EXIF are also disqualified?!! where do you draw the line.
Think you guys need to seriously chill out as this is being very pedantic IMO. Been hanging out round these parts for years now and that was the first time I entered a comp...purely to join in the fun....and my work gets turned down for a 1 pixel line worth of border...dear ohh dear.
6 people dq'd for borders...surely its best to advise for next time? a lot of poeple spent a lot of time in setting up and taking thier shots and they have been dq'd for the most petty thing. lighten up guys fgs!
I doubt I'll join in again if this is the way it works...its a photography competition - people need to chill out.
morgan said:My point being is that people get disqualified over a 1 pixel strip of grey around a black border...its crazy.
I know its a 'fun' competition and no prize etc. I only entered as I wanted to get involved with whats going on and it was my first ever entry, even after being a heavy visitor of this forum for years.
I couldnt care less who wins etc, but surely peoples work deserves to be judged, just out of curiousity its polite to give points even if the outcome is you get disquailified?
I just find it funny that it seems some of the people who are saying rules are rules are probably only doing so to jump up the ladder a little more. As previous posters have said, its mainly the stronger entries that have been disqualified...
morgan said:I couldnt care less who wins etc, but surely peoples work deserves to be judged, just out of curiousity its polite to give points even if the outcome is you get disquailified?
wunkley said:I've tried to take the **** with my entry this round, for a bit of light relief to be honest. If no one gets it then so be it, I like it (in my opinion)
cyKey said:Thank you for proving my point. No-one reads the rules, so people should quit moaning about them. If people read them and follow them then they have nothing to complain about. If you get busted for not reading them then its your fault. I'm talking about both the competition and the forum rules as the forum rules say you should fully star out swear words, which you didn't. You should by the way.
wunkley said:**** ***![]()