• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

OcUK RX7800XT and RX7700XT review thread

CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
I don't think the RTX4060TI is comparable as its terrible. The RX7800XT is an RTX4070 competitor for nearly the same streetprice,so the RTX4070 would be no better.

But it seems some retailers are bundling Starfield with it(OcUK shows no game bundled),so its better value than both for now....which is not hard.
Click to expand...
The ones worth buying are over £600, CAT. :)
 
Now I am imagining an alternative reality where the new cards slotted in at the MSRP for last Gen whilst offering significant gen on gen performance uplifts:

7600 --> 7500
7700XT/7800XT -- > 7700 / 7700XT
7900XT --> 7800XT
7900XTX --> 7900XT

(So in the example above the 7900XT as we know it was launched as the 7800XT @ the 6800XT MSRP ($649 IIRC).

Same on the Nvidia side whereby the 4080 as it currently is called was released as the 4070 with a new ~14000 CU card being the 4080. With pricing aligning with what they currently cost (so basically a 4080 performance for £579).

Then I sipped my coffee and woke back up again... *sigh*
 
uscool said:
whats up wth OCUK stock and pricing ?
Click to expand...

Any news on 7800 xt?

That would mean the RTX4070 12GB is barely 10% faster in rasterised performance: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/asus-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-dual-oc/31.html The 4070 has always been a bad buy and with the 7800xt and 7700xt either side of it raster wise it's looking like an even crapper buy now.
forums.overclockers.co.uk forums.overclockers.co.uk
 
So looking at the 7700XT, if you review it as a 6700XT replacement, you're basically getting 20% more performance for virtually the same power draw.

Better than the 6800XT to 7800XT but the pricing is terrible. You might as well pony up the extra money for the 7800XT.

The 7700XT could have been a real hero card but not at its current pricing.
 
Last edited:
Yup, AMD over promised and under delivered on the power front.

Much like with Ryzen, I hope AMD make massive learnings from this first generation of chiplet GPU design and improve/refine the technology over the next two generations.
 
Last edited:
Guru3D links:

7800XT (Reference)
www.guru3d.com

Radeon RX 7800 XT reference review

AMD has elegantly unveiled the Radeon RX 7800 XT, marking a refined expansion of their product range that spans from mainstream to the high-end graphics niche. This addition epitomizes a significant s...
www.guru3d.com www.guru3d.com

7800XT (Sapphire Nitro)
www.guru3d.com

Sapphire Radeon RX 7800 XT Nitro+ review

Sapphire has gracefully hopped aboard the 7800 XT express with their Nitro+ OC edition from the card series. With its factory adjustments and a quiet design, users can enjoy a more robust cooling syst...
www.guru3d.com www.guru3d.com

7800XT (Asus TUF)
www.guru3d.com

ASUS Radeon RX 7800 XT TUF review

ASUS introduces the TUF Gaming OC edition to the Radeon RX 7800 XT lineup. Equipped with a factory optimization and a noise-reduced design, this card offers users an enlarged cooler for enhanced therm...
www.guru3d.com www.guru3d.com

7800XT (XFX Merc 319)
www.guru3d.com

XFX Radeon RX 7800 XT MERC 319 review

XFX introduced their enhanced MERC 319 model in the speedster series derived from the Radeon RX 7800 XT. For an additional $20, users receive a significantly larger cooler, a quieter operation, and a ...
www.guru3d.com www.guru3d.com


7700XT (Sapphire Pulse)
www.guru3d.com

Radeon RX 7700 XT review

AMD has unveiled the Radeon RX 7700 XT 12GB, enhancing their portfolio in the mainstream to high-end graphics sector. While the release faced some delays, these GPUs come with notable shader capabilit...
www.guru3d.com www.guru3d.com
 
Worse RT than even a 4060 Ti, no DLSS advantage, worse power consumption and more expensive. Meh.

At this point I don't even want to imagine the kinds of horrors NV+AMD have in store for the next generation.
 
Last edited:
Freddie1980 said:
The power draw is a bit of an eye opener espeically when you put it up against it's competition the RTX 4070. Whatever happened to RDNA 3 being 50% more efficient per watt?
Click to expand...

Scott Herkelman Q&A: AMD Radeon boss​

Club386: Energy efficiency also appears weaker than Nvidia on paper – RTX 4070, for example, has a 200W TGP, compared to 245W for RX 7700 XT. Is this an area of concern?

SH: We have a company initiative in driving good performance per watt across our portfolio of products. We look at perf per watt on every chart when bringing all chips to market. In notebooks, it matters greatly. In desktop, however, it matters, but not to everyone. There are some people who are really concerned about power, others don’t care as much. We definitely want to make a better perf-per-watt chip. A better chip makes the overall board more affordable, which enables us to do different things with the pricing and hopefully supply additional performance to the gamer. It’s also good for the environment and your own electricity bill.

Power is definitely a prime initiative. You’ll see us over time get better and better at it. We need to catch up. There are still bugs that we need to fix. Idle power is one of them. We believe there is a driver fix for it. It’s a wonky one, actually. We do see some inconsistencies with idle power that shouldn’t be there, and we’re working with our partners to maybe help with that. It will be cleaned up, but it might take a bit more time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom