I agree that they both are disappointing . .
. . . not the chips though
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I agree that they both are disappointing . .
not all Intel chips are that badWaste of sand
Yeah just watching it now, he’s pretty much nailed exactly what’s going on.Spot on Daniel
Multithreaded benchmarks are far more influenced by the 65W TDP.I wonder if it's something as simple as windows scheduler is better at pushing multiple threads. Even in windows the 9000 series looks amazing in single threaded benchmarks, but then falls back in multithreading.
Though this is just a very uninformed stray thought. So I could be very wrong
Really weird behaviour on these chips. In traditional Windows based benchmarks Zen 5 barely moves the needle from Zen 4 but in Linux it Godzilla stomps over everything
https://www.phoronix.com/review/ryzen-9600x-9700x/10 (checkout the database numbers as well)
It would be nice if someone from AMD could come out and explain exactly what's going on
Using the 7900 XTX does make it far harder to find actual review figures to compare marketing vs reality
Now, ComputerBase did have one review with both the RTX 4090 and 7900 XTX but mostly other games.