Official Crysis Demo thread

I have asked already, instead of slaging each others opinions which is pure BS.

Can someone who can run this game well at a Highish RES and High or Highest settings on Vista64 and with 4GB of RAM try it with 2GB and let me know diff in FPS. (then I need buy a better 4GB kit as previous 2 have been crap).

Thanks upfront to anyone who takes the time to do this. :)
 
Undesirable said:
Here's a batch of screenshots I took as I progressed through the game. I haven't finished compiling them quite yet, as I get a rather low framerate whilst playing at full detail. You may have seen these on another forum, but... oh well. Lossless @ 1920 x 1200!

lots of pics
Click to expand...

very very nice....hey if you get the chance take some in the more dense forest areas.
 
Undesirable, Might be or might not be, 2 other peeps on lower spec get better FPS as they both have 4GB (my guess).

I had same issue with maxing FEAR as new on high end kit at that time, I stopped playing it and got a SAT DEL on a 2GB kit of Corsair PC3500 up from 1GB (ddr1 at that time).

Lag and page file been eaten issues went away and game was fine so were all others to follow that liked 2GB like CoD2, etc.
 
By the way, it seems water kills them instantly, I saw a guy run up to the coast/waters edge and just die... :[
Click to expand...
Wasn't the case for me, i put a AI driver on the map, he had no weapon and was running from me, went into the water and actually swam for his life, eventually forgot to come up for air and drowned lol But still better than any other games water interaction imo.

Is 64bit crysis actually even working for anyone ? i was under the impression it wasn't ?
Does heavily eat the page file though (1.2gb) most ive ever seen used.
 
DavidB said:
Wasn't the case for me, i put a AI driver on the map, he had no weapon and was running from me, went into the water and actually swam for his life, eventually forgot to come up for air and drowned lol But still better than any other games water interaction imo.
Click to expand...

Heh, I was thinking "wow that's some well coded AI", right up until the bit where you say he ended up drowning :o
 
BTW, I did have "out of memory" and "page file warning" msg's on screen a few times but game was acting up in the menu with the new drivers, sometimes locked up totally.

And esp as I know from beta testing for MS that Vista64 Ultimate is better with 4GB than 2GB overall (but aint had much luck with a finding a good 4GB kit, as thye are still newish).
 
helmutcheese said:
The Crysis DEV's in a interview not so long ago said it will run at mid RES's with High settings on a 8600GTS and to run higher you need a better card (guessing 8800's).

So you happy being told BS ?, cause I cant run it well at Highest with my res as low as 1280x960, now this is nearly 2008, I game at 1920x1440 ideally, and all other games in Lost Planet (buggy port) and HL2 etc run really well maxed.

Crysis may look better but even half the FPS would be good not 1/4 or 1/8 of what I get in other games.

I hope this is a buggy Demo and the final will be far better and all debug code removed and better Nvidia driver for the launch, not half baked one.

BTW, I know the 8000's tech is 1year old but there aint anything better today so what can we run the game on ?.

They can also scale the game into the future tech's with patches no problems, but they should optimise it for todays tech IMO.


Quoted " Clearly helmut is talking complete crap, it's already very apparant he has some attitude issues and needs to sort them out."


Tom|Nbk is full of it and does not like anyone having an opinion as I have in this thread, everything I said was IMO, I just dont like ignorent peeps saying "LOL" etc as I aint "LOL'ing" at them liking Crysis.

He is well disliked here and changes his story daily as threads show and also causes arguements but unlike rest of us gets out of it with his smart talk crap (always innocent) for a fact now he is on ignore forever.
Click to expand...


For a start braniac there is no debug code in the demo and the demo is pretty much representivie of the final product, It's great as your crying over the fact you can't max it with your "ultra" rig to your liking so instead you take it out on others and disagree with everyone purely because your rig is running it like **** :D

Also "Oh noes no one likes me"

What are you 15?, I think most people would agree I am an asset to the community and have put a lot more valuable input than you ever would.

Seriously with the name "helmutcheese" do you really think your ever going to be taken seriously you look like a pathetic 15 year old, and when you resort to play ground tactics it just makes you look like an even bigger fool :D

Also I'm on your ignore list yet you always seem to reply to me?, great having a sneak peak isn't it :D. You also seem to think I care im on the list, get a grip you epic failure.
 
I don't mind not being able to run it @ max, it was the same with Far Cry when that came out... the top card at the time was a 9800XT I think and that ran pretty crap at max settings. It wasn't until the X800 series came out that people were able to get acceptable performance at Very High.

It's still a great game to play now though as it has superb graphics for a 3.5 y/o game. I'm currently running through the game again, Realistic mode is great fun. :)

Same goes for Oblivion. I had a top spec system when that came out and it ran like aids, but it still looks amazing 18 months later with modern hardware.
 
When peeps claiming "Very High", can they tell up RES please.

As for FarCry, we did not game as high a RES back then and I had no issues on a GF4 TI 4600 then a 6800Ultra after the S.M 3.0 patch.
 
crysisvz1.jpg


Runing on a q6600 with a 8800gts resized from 1680x1050
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom