**Official Duke Nukem Forever Thread**

Everything? Even the non-square things? Everything?

Okay, hyperbole aside - apart from the character models... almost everything.

The environments are horrific.

I said it before, and I'll say it again: If it was released as a budget title, it'd be fine. It wasn't. It isn't.

Meanwhile those who want to lie to themselves will just keep screaming "IT'S DUKE, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!!" to any naysayers regardless of valid criticism. I loved the original Duke Nukem as much as any PC gamer at the time, but this is a shoddy mess quite literally yanked from the fire at the last minute, polished up a little and shoved out to make a quick, cheeky buck at the expense of a ravenous fanbase.
 
I think the graphics look fine. At 1920x1200 they're perfectly acceptable and in fact look better than quite a few "modern" shooters.

And I'm usually hard to please where graphics are concerned...

Maybe you need a better quality monitor :p
 
Mine has been ordered finally, well yesterday. I know it's not going to be amazing, but I did enjoy the demo and it will have served its purpose for me, if I end up having as much fun playing it as the demo.

Oh no, not Royal fail :(
Fingers crossed. I really want to install this tonight otherwise, I won't be playing this until next weekend :(

The place I ordered mine from sometimes can get it to me on a Saturday using Royal Mail but more than likely next week I am guessing for me this time.
 
I think the 'ravenous fanbase' are probably mostly just glad that Duke has finally been released.

I feel funny typing that ^. It almost makes no sense.
 
Okay, hyperbole aside - apart from the character models... almost everything.

The environments are horrific.

I said it before, and I'll say it again: If it was released as a budget title, it'd be fine. It wasn't. It isn't.

Meanwhile those who want to lie to themselves will just keep screaming "IT'S DUKE, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!!" to any naysayers regardless of valid criticism. I loved the original Duke Nukem as much as any PC gamer at the time, but this is a shoddy mess quite literally yanked from the fire at the last minute, polished up a little and shoved out to make a quick, cheeky buck at the expense of a ravenous fanbase.

Basically you don't like the graphics? What did you expect from a small try on an xbox? Which probably had texture compression and zero AF/AA.
 
Last edited:
Anyone had a chance to try the online out yet? What's it like?

I'm tempted to hit that buy button on Steam but I'm hearing bad things about the game's SP. No-one has said much about the MP though.
 
PC version looked fine to me......nice round shapes and all.

get off ya xbox and get it on a pc. the way any shooter is meant to be played (I am correct on that matter FYI)
 
Guardian review:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2011/jun/10/duke-nukem-forever-game-review

And even the nostalgia – and bad taste humour – can't make up for the frustrating load times.

Review is on the 360 - not the case on the PC

The game sets its stall out early. Literally: it opens in a toilet, with Duke facing the bowl, and an instruction to press RT to ****.

Amazing game design imo

However you dress it up, Duke Nukem Forever is Doom with added political incorrectness, or "same old, same old" as far as the character is concerned. That's not necessarily a problem – the old adage about things not being broken is one many developers could pay more attention to – but what do you get for 15 years of patience?

Not much at all. Visuals are grainy (perhaps a deliberate throwback to older Nukem titles?),

Turn off the film grain!

aiming is clunky and there are occasional frame rate issues and buggy moments.

Review is on the 360 - not the case on the PC

And then there's the load time.

Review is on the 360 - not the case on the PC

The game is tough – a good thing – and you're regularly thrown into hard-fought battles with multiple enemies and rampaging bosses. You will die, frequently, and often after only 30 seconds or so of action ... And you then have to wait some 45 seconds or so to have another go. If you think the Duke's ****ed off, see how you feel after 20 minutes of that.

noob!

A mark for nostalgia then – it's the Duke, after all – and one for the game. If this was 15 years in the making, it makes you wonder what they did for the other 14 years and 10 months.

haha.............. my sides.


So we can conclude that it is better on the PC, actually not a bad game and I am less mature than my family think I am. :p
 
Last edited:
Basically you don't like the graphics? What did you expect from a small try on an xbox? Which probably had texture compression and zero AF/AA.

Oh, come on. You make it sound like the 360 version is running on an entirely different engine or, at worst, is a console that could barely power a calculator. I know this is the PC Games section, but surely anti-console arrogance hasn't made it THAT far yet?

There's an easy difference between lacking AA/AF and incorporating compression, and a crappy engine. For what it's worth, the PC demo also displayed the same horrendous, blocky environments and shoddy gameplay. It's also noteworthy at the time that many fans immediately started trying to convince themselves that the demo MUST have been a very early promo build and couldn't be representational of the final product.

Pity it is. Still, I see the apologists and self-delusional are out in full force as I suspected so I'll just leave my opinions there. I guess the actual critics will soon be chiming in with their opinions, which I doubt will stretch too far from mine. Here's looking forward to seeing said apologists then attempting to belittle the opinions of pro critics in order to convince themselves that this was a worthy £40 purchase.

Oh... wait, that's already begun.
 
Back
Top Bottom