**** Official Fallout 4 Thread ****

review embargo lifts 12 hours before release, so depends on how quickly and educated your sources are posting their reviews tbh.

I'd say they might have reviewed already, and are waiting for that time. If they publish and say its rubbish youve still got time to cance l preorders etc.
 
Don't get this then, its say 0.75 the size of skyrim, but theres no way you could sprint that in 11 mins. Dont think I ever managed to run the length of any fallout game or skyrim.

**** this, close to just binning this thread off now until i've finished the game, its either people moaning it doesn't look good enough when all theyve seen is rubbish screenies or it being too small, plus just constant spoilers now.

Rather play the game myself than make my mind up a week before release based on unsubstatiated rumours.
 
The fact that you can sprint in Fallout 4 is going to skew how people perceive the game's physical size due to the fact that you're moving quicker than in Skyrim to Fallout 3.
 
People go thru life throwing negative comments at everything they do.. Some people were born to moan.. Play the game for what it is and enjoy it.. I can't wait to jump into this but i have witcher 3 to complete before i do.. :)
 
Skyrim was great, is this game like that? Doing quests and stuff while following a storyline i mean.

Never tried the fallout games before.

Mostly like that, yes. The setting is different and the combat is different because it's mainly ranged rather than mainly melee, but it's the same open world stuff with a central storyline that has a succession of quests on it and a variety of optional other quests that would be useful for gaining skills, loot and equipment and for learning more about the stories of the gameworld.

If you play Fallout 1 and 2, be prepared for very different games to FO3, FO:NV and Skyrim. FO1 and FO2 are old and it shows. Low resolution top-down stuff, not at all like the others in that respect.

If you play Fallout 3, it might be worth bearing in mind that the entire opening part of the game while you're still in the vault is in some ways a very long opening tutorial section even after the more obvious opening tutorial section. I was a bit disappointed in the game until I left the vault, which in my opinion is where the game really starts.

Fallout New Vegas is very similar to Fallout 3, although the storyline is completely new (and quite different) and the setting is quite different. I think they did a very good job of making the game both different enough from and similar enough to Fallout 3.

Patches could be a good idea for both because as far as I know there were some bugs even in the final official versions (e.g. companion weapon loss bug in casinos). Also DLC, since you could probably get versions with all the DLC for not much nowadays.

Hmm...Steam is selling FO3 for £10 and £4 each for the DLC or £15 with the DLC. Rather a lot for such an old game, presumably because Fallout 4 is attracting attention. You can get it new with all DLC for £9 from Amazon.

If I didn't already have it, I'd cheerfully pay £15 for it with all the DLC. It's a really good game.
 
The graphics are more than decent. People are just whinging because they're miserable gits who will never be pleased.

I've just started playing Stalker: Shadow of Chernobyl without any graphical mods at all, only the fixes in the Zone Reclaimation Project mod. The graphics weren't spectacular in 2007 so they're far behind modern standards...but they're fine.

Graphics do matter because they're the window to the gameworld and they strongly affect the interface, but past that they're not even the icing on the cake - they're the decoration on the icing on the cake. Besides, people aren't even criticising FO4 graphics on the basis of uncompressed full resolution video since there isn't any. It's a bit silly, really.
 
I've just started playing Stalker: Shadow of Chernobyl without any graphical mods at all, only the fixes in the Zone Reclaimation Project mod. The graphics weren't spectacular in 2007 so they're far behind modern standards...but they're fine.

Graphics do matter because they're the window to the gameworld and they strongly affect the interface, but past that they're not even the icing on the cake - they're the decoration on the icing on the cake. Besides, people aren't even criticising FO4 graphics on the basis of uncompressed full resolution video since there isn't any. It's a bit silly, really.

No they're basing them off of the official screenshots and trailers.
 
[..]
PS: The game could look exactly the same as FO3, the game play will still be as awesome as ever.
Yes it's nice to have better visuals (which this game will) but it's never a deal breaker at all. [..]

I'd cheerfully pay £30 for a new Fallout game from Bethesda or Obsidian that used exactly the same game engine and graphics as Fallout 3 or Fallout New Vegas. No changes in gameplay at all, just a new story and a new setting.
 
I'd cheerfully pay £30 for a new Fallout game from Bethesda or Obsidian that used exactly the same game engine and graphics as Fallout 3 or Fallout New Vegas. No changes in gameplay at all, just a new story and a new setting.

This.

Also usually I do not pre-order. Though I make an exception for developers I ish to support and games I know I will enjoy. Right now I have Fallout 4, Just Cause 3 and Deus Ex: Mankind Devided on pre-order. Doubt any of those games will let me down. This is probably the most I have ever had on pre-order, usually I always wait for reviews and then even wait a few month after release for that half price sale :D
 
This is going to sound really stupid but...which maps in the above pictures are which ?

Does it go Skyrim at the back, Fallout 4 then the smaller one is Fallout 3 ?

:|
 
Back
Top Bottom